<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">inppd</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Инновационная наука: Психология. Педагогика. Дефектология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2658-7165</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Don State Technical University - DSTU, Rostov-on-Don, Russia</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23947/2658-7165-2023-6-4-10-16</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">inppd-156</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОБЩАЯ ПСИХОЛОГИЯ, ПСИХОЛОГИЯ ЛИЧНОСТИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Сплоченность как фактор позитивных  отношений в семье в условиях неопределенности:  представления молодых людей</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Cohesion as a Factor of Positive Family Relations  in Conditions of Uncertainty: Young People’s Ideas</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1677-9608</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Берсирова</surname><given-names>А. К.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Bersirova</surname><given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Берсирова Ася Казбековна -кандидат психологических наук, доцент кафедры педагогической психологии факультета педагогики и психологии</p><p>385000, Республика Адыгея, г. Майкоп, ул. Первомайская, 208</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Bersirova Asya K. - Cand. Sci. (Psychology), Associate Professor of Educational Psychology Department, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology </p><p>208, Pervomayskaya St., Maykop, Republic of Adygea, 385000</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">asya.bersirova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФГБОУ ВО «Адыгейский государственный университет»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Adyghe State University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>10</fpage><lpage>16</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Берсирова А.К., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Берсирова А.К.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bersirova A.K.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.inov-ppd.ru/jour/article/view/156">https://www.inov-ppd.ru/jour/article/view/156</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. Современные условия повышенной неопределенности отражаются на представлениях молодых людей о семейной системе. При формировании образа будущей семьи у молодого человека отражается отрефлексированный опыт взаимоотношений в родительской семье. Сплоченность семьи как мера поддерживающего взаимодействия обеспечивает не только гармоничное развитие личности, но и выступает фактором создания позитивных отношений в семье. Рассмотрение представлений молодежи о сплоченности в условиях неопределенности позволит выявить меры социально-психологической поддержки.</p></sec><sec><title>Цель</title><p>Цель. Выявление и описание представлений молодых людей о сплоченности как о факторе позитивных отношений в семье в условиях неопределенности. Материалы и методы. В исследовании приняли участие 125 студентов-магистрантов (из них 45 юношей, 80 девушек). Была использована методика «Шкала семейной адаптации и сплоченности» (Олсон, Портнер, Лави).</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты исследования</title><p>Результаты исследования. Показана специфика и гендерные отличия выраженности показателей представлений о сплоченности и адаптации в семье у современных магистрантов. Девушки, по сравнению с юношами, ретроспективно ниже оценивают степень выраженности сплоченности и адаптации в семье. Респонденты в целом демонстрируют противоречивые представления относительно факторов сплоченности и адаптации в родительской семье. С одной стороны, уровень семейной адаптации определяется как «экстремальный» и «хаотичный», а с другой, семейная сплоченность определяется как «оптимальная», «сбалансированная», что отражает противоречивость представлений магистрантов.</p></sec><sec><title>Обсуждение и заключение</title><p>Обсуждение и заключение. Сплоченность семьи — важный фактор повышения жизнестойкости как самой семьи, так и индивида. Значимыми точками рефлексии личности как субъекта матримониального поведения являются представления о роли сплоченности в построении успешной семьи. Повысить осознанность представлений и разрешить их противоречивость возможно с помощью социально-психологического тренинга.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. Modern conditions of increased uncertainty are reflected in young people’s ideas about the family system. While the image of a future family forms, a young person’s relationships experience obtained in their family of origin finds its way in it. It is noteworthy that this experience is already self-reflected by the person. Family cohesion as a supportive interaction not only provides one with harmonious personality growth but also stands as a basis for creating positive relations in the family. Study of young people’s ideas about cohesion in conditions of uncertainty will allow one to reveal the measures of socio-psychological support.</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>Purpose. In our research, we will identify and describe young people’s ideas about cohesion as a factor of positive family relations in conditions of uncertainty. Materials and Methods. 125 master’s students (among them 45 young men and 80 young women) participated in the study. We used the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale (Olson, Porter, &amp; Lavee).</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. Cohesion and adaptability ideas indicators’ specifics and gender differences in modern master’s students are reflected. Compared to men, young women retrospectively lower asses family cohesion and adaptability expression level. In general, participants show ambiguous ideas regarding cohesion and adaptability in the family of origin. On the one hand, family adaptability level characterized as “extreme” and “chaotic”. On the other hand, family cohesion was assessed as “mid-range” and “balanced”, thus reflecting contradictory ideas of the master’s students.</p><p>Discussion and Conclusion. Family cohesion is an important factor in the improvement of hardiness in both the family and individual. Important reflexive points of the person as a subject of matrimonial behaviour are ideas about cohesion role in successful family development. We suggest that socio-psychological training can increase awareness of the ideas and solve their contradictoriness.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>сплоченность семьи</kwd><kwd>сплоченность</kwd><kwd>семейные отношения</kwd><kwd>представления личности</kwd><kwd>условия  неопределенности</kwd><kwd>факторы позитивных отношений</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>family cohesion</kwd><kwd>cohesion</kwd><kwd>family relations</kwd><kwd>person’s ideas</kwd><kwd>conditions of uncertainty</kwd><kwd>positive  relationship factors</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Барадакова, Н. В. (2017). Формирование представлений о ценностях частной жизни у студентов вуза. Южный федеральный университет.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baradakova, N. V. (2017). Shaping ideas about the private life values among university students. Southern Federal University. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гурко, Т. А. (2016). Теоретические подходы к изучению семьи. Институт социологии РАН.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barber, B. K., &amp; Buehler, C. (1996). Family cohesion and enmeshment: Different constructs, different effects. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(2), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.2307/353507</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Девятых, С. Ю. (2010). Сексуальность и социализация: вопросы формирования матримониальных ориентаций личности. Смоленский государственный университет.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Birkeland, B., Weimand, B., Ruud, T., Maybery, D., &amp; Vederhus, J. K. (2021). Perceived family cohesion, social support, and quality of life in patients undergoing treatment for substance use disorders compared with patients with mental and physical disorders. Addiction Science &amp; Clinical Practice, 16, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-021-00252-8</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Куфтяк, Е. В. (2012). Семейное совладание: концептуальные положения и Исследование. Южно-российский журнал социальных наук, 2, 16–30.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chen, P., &amp; Harris, K. M. (2019). Association of positive family relationships with mental health trajectories from adolescence to midlife. Jama Pediatrics, 173(12). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3336</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Леонтьев, Д. А. (2015). Вызов неопределенности как центральная проблема психологии личности. Психологические исследования, 8(40). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v8i40.555</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Devyatykh, S. Yu. (2010). Sexuality and socialization: The issues of a person matrimonial orientations development. Smolensk State University. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мерзлякова, С. В. (2014). Сплоченность семьи как условие формирования семейного самоопределения юношей и девушек. Вестник Южно-Уральского государственного гуманитарно-педагогического университета, 9(1), 170–179.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gurko, T. A. (2016). Theoretical approaches to the study of the family. The Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Нозикова, Н. В. (2015). Структурный анализ психосемантической системы семейной социально-психологической целенаправленности. Культурно-историческая психология, 11(4), 44–54.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hamilton, E., &amp; Carr, A. (2016). Systematic review of self‐report family assessment measures. Family process, 55(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12200</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Реан, А. А. (2017). Семья в структуре ценностей молодежи. Российский психологический журнал, 14(1), 62–76.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kerig, P. K. (2019). Parenting and family systems. Handbook of parenting. Routledge/Taylor &amp; Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429433214-1</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ребенок, В. В. (2021). Деструктивные семьи, типы взаимоотношений в них и их влияние на формирование личности и межличностное общение во взрослом возрасте. Северо-Кавказский психологический вестник, 19(4), 17–33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kharitonova, E. V. (2021). The modern Russian family in the conditions of uncertainty. Institute of Psychology Russian Academy of Sciences. Social and Economic Psychology, 6(4(24)), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep_2021_24_4_04 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Харитонова, Е. В. (2021). Современная российская семья в условиях неопределенности. Институт психологии Российской академии наук. Социальная и экономическая психология, 6(4(24)), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.38098/ipran.sep_2021_24_4_04</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuftyak, E. V. (2012). Family coping: Conceptual positions and research. Southern Russian Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 16–30. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Щербакова, Т. Н., Берсирова, А. К. (2017). Представления студентов о психологических факторах успеха в семейных отношениях. Известия Южного федерального университета. Педагогические науки, 1, 76–82.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leontiev, D. A. (2015). The challenge of uncertainty as the key issue of the psychology of personality. Psychological Studies, 8(40). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v8i40.555 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Щербакова, Т. Н., Забара, Е. А. (2020). Психологические детерминанты агрессии родителей: возможности самоконтроля. Инновационная наука: Психология, Педагогика, Дефектология, 3(2), 101–111.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Merzlyakova, S. V. (2014). Family cohesion as a condition of shaping family self-determination of young men and girls. The Herald of South-Ural state Humanities-Pedagogical University, 9(1), 170–179. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barber, B. K., &amp; Buehler, C. (1996). Family cohesion and enmeshment: Different constructs, different effects. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58(2), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.2307/353507</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nozikova, N. V. (2015). Psychosemantic system of social psychological goal-directedness in families: A structural analysis. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 11(4), 44–54. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Birkeland, B., Weimand, B., Ruud, T., Maybery, D., &amp; Vederhus, J. K. (2021). Perceived family cohesion, social support, and quality of life in patients undergoing treatment for substance use disorders compared with patients with mental and physical disorders. Addiction Science &amp; Clinical Practice, 16, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-021-00252-8</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rean, A. A. (2017). A family in the structure of values of young people. Russian Psychological Journal, 14(1), 62–76. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Chen, P., &amp; Harris, K. M. (2019). Association of positive family relationships with mental health trajectories from adolescence to midlife. Jama Pediatrics, 173(12). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3336</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rebenok, V. V. (2021). Destructive families, the types of relationships in them and their impact on the formation of personality and interpersonal communication in adulthood. North-Caucasian Psychological Bulletin, 19(4), 17–33. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hamilton, E., &amp; Carr, A. (2016). Systematic review of self‐report family assessment measures. Family process, 55(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12200</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scherbakova, T. N., Bersirova, A. K. (2017). Students’ ideas about psychological factors of success in family relations. Proceedings of the Southern Federal University. Pedagogical Sciences, 1, 76–82. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kerig, P. K. (2019). Parenting and family systems. Handbook of parenting. Routledge/Taylor &amp; Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429433214-1</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Scherbakova, T. N., Zabara, E. A. (2020). Psychological determinants of parental aggression: Opportunities for self-control. Innovative Science: Psychology, Pedagogy, Defectology, 3(2), 101–111. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Szcześniak, M., &amp; Tułecka, M. (2020). Family functioning and life satisfaction: The mediatory role of emotional intelligence. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2020(13), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S240898</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Szcześniak, M., &amp; Tułecka, M. (2020). Family functioning and life satisfaction: The mediatory role of emotional intelligence. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2020(13), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S240898</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Xiang, G., Li, Q., Du, X., Liu, X., Xiao, M., &amp; Chen, H. (2022). Links between family cohesion and subjective well-being in adolescents and early adults: The mediating role of self-concept clarity and hope. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 41(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00795-0</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Xiang, G., Li, Q., Du, X., Liu, X., Xiao, M., &amp; Chen, H. (2022). Links between family cohesion and subjective well-being in adolescents and early adults: The mediating role of self-concept clarity and hope. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 41(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00795-0</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
