<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">inppd</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Инновационная наука: Психология. Педагогика. Дефектология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2658-7165</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Don State Technical University - DSTU, Rostov-on-Don, Russia</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23947/2658-7165-2023-6-5-81-93</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">inppd-215</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОБЩАЯ ПЕДАГОГИКА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>GENERAL PEDAGOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Цифровая педагогика: проблемы и готовность обучения в цифровой среде</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Digital Pedagogy: Challenges and Readiness for Learning in Digital Environment</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-008X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ефремова</surname><given-names>Н. Ф.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Efremova</surname><given-names>N. F.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Надежда Федоровна Ефремова, доктор педагогических наук, профессор, заведующий кафедрой «Педагогические измерения»</p><p>344003, г. Ростов-на-Дону, пл. Гагарина, 1</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Nadezhda Fedorovna Efremova, Dr. Sci. (Pedagogy), Professor, Head of the «Pedagogical Measurements» Department</p><p>1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">nefremova61@donstu.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Донской государственный технический университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Don State Technical University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>22</day><month>12</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>81</fpage><lpage>93</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Ефремова Н.Ф., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Ефремова Н.Ф.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Efremova N.F.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.inov-ppd.ru/jour/article/view/215">https://www.inov-ppd.ru/jour/article/view/215</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. В статье обозначены тенденции развития цифровой педагогики и условий обучения в новой образовательной среде. Актуальность исследования обусловлена изменениями технологий и средств обучения, включения в сферу образования возможностей цифровых технологий и информационной среды, способствующих повышению эффективности и результативности образовательной деятельности и требующих определенной цифровой грамотности ее участников. Новизна исследования заключается в выявлении проблем цифровой педагогики и оценке готовности студентов и преподавателей к использованию цифровых инструментов в образовании.</p></sec><sec><title>Цель</title><p>Цель. Комплексное рассмотрение возможностей, проблем и рисков обучения в цифровой среде.</p></sec><sec><title>Материалы и методы</title><p>Материалы и методы. При анализе состояния цифровизации в системах российского и зарубежного образования и существующих требований к цифровым компетенциям участников образовательного процесса были применены теоретические методы. В практической части методом анкетирования по широкому спектру выявлялся уровень готовности преподавателей и студентов к цифровому переходу и способности использования возможностей цифровой образовательной среды.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты исследования</title><p>Результаты исследования. Проведен анализ различных стратегий и практик, моделей и педагогических инноваций в области развития дидактики. Выявлены сильные и слабые стороны, положительные и проблемные моменты, организационные и дидактические трудности обучения в цифровой среде. Систематизированы теоретико-методологические основания дидактики в условиях цифровой трансформации образования. Проанализированы результаты опроса студентов и преподавателей, сделаны выводы об их готовности к цифровому сдвигу в образовании.</p></sec><sec><title>Обсуждение результатов</title><p>Обсуждение результатов.  Выделены основные факторы, обусловливающие обеспечение условий эффективного обучения в цифровой среде. Отмечено, что новое научное направление – цифровая педагогика – должно дать ответы на многие вопросы цифрового перехода. Сохраняя лучшее традиционной методологии, ее возможности необходимо обогатить новым содержанием, современными инструментами и приемами обучения с использованием цифровых технологий и информационно-коммуникационных средств.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. The article outlines the development trends of digital pedagogy and learning conditions in the new educational environment. The urgency of the study is justified through changes in technology and methods of providing education, as well as implications in the education sector with digital technologies and digital landscape. All of this helps improve the efficiency of educational activity and its outcome. However, it also requires digital literacy from its users. The novelty lies in identification of digital pedagogy problems and assessment of students' readiness for the implementation of digital tools in learning.</p></sec><sec><title>Purpose</title><p>Purpose. In our study, we will consider capabilities, challenges, and risks of education in a digital environment in an integrated way.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and Methods</title><p>Materials and Methods. We used theoretical methods for the analysis of digitalization state in the Russian and foreign education systems, and current requirements for digital skills of educational process participants. In the empirical part, the questionnaire method regarding teachers’ and students’ readiness level for the digital shift and ability to fully operate with digital educational environment was taken on the broad matter.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. Various strategies and practices, models, and pedagogical innovations in the didactics development area were analyzed. We have revealed strengths and weaknesses, positive and problematic moments, organizational and didactic issues of learning in the digital landscape. Theoretical and methodological foundations of didactics under the conditions of digital transformation were structured. We analyzed the responses of teachers and students and draw a conclusion about their readiness for the digital shift in education.</p></sec><sec><title>Discussion</title><p>Discussion. The main factors that impact effective leaning in the digital landscape are stressed. It is proposed that digital pedagogy, as a new direction in science, is bound to answer plenty of questions regarding the digital shift. We have to enrich traditional methodology capabilities with a new content, modern tools and methods of teaching using digital technologies, as well as information and communications means, leaving the best to its side.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>цифровая трансформация</kwd><kwd>цифровые навыки</kwd><kwd>анкетирование</kwd><kwd>цифровые ресурсы</kwd><kwd>образовательная среда</kwd><kwd>цифровая дидактика</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>digital transformation</kwd><kwd>digital skills</kwd><kwd>questionnaire method</kwd><kwd>digital resources</kwd><kwd>educational environment</kwd><kwd>digital didactics</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Абакумова, И. В., Финько, М. В., и Князева, Ю. С. (2021). Трансформация высшего образования в условиях глобализации: новые форматы и альтернативные модели. Alma Mater, 9, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.09-21.007</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Abakumova, I. V., Finko, M. V., &amp; Knyazeva, Yu. S. (2021). Transformation of higher education in the context of globalization: New formats and alternative models. Alma Mater, 9, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.20339/AM.09-21.007 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Аймалетдинов, Т. А., Баймуратова, Л. Р., Зайцева, О. А., Имаева, Г. Р., и Спиридонова, Л. В. (2019). Цифровая грамотность российских педагогов. Готовность к использованию цифровых технологий в учебном процессе. Издательство НАФИ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aimaletdinov, T. A., Baimuratova, L. R., Zaitseva, O. A., Imaeva, G. R., &amp; Spiridonova, L. V. (2019). Digital literacy of Russian teachers. Readiness for digital technologies in the educational process. NAFI Publishing. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бурганова, Л. А., и Юрьева, О. В. (2021). Готовность вузовских преподавателей к работе в цифровой образовательной среде: компетентностный подход. Вестник экономики, права и социологии, 2, 67–72.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Amhag, L., Hellström, L., &amp; Stigmar, M. (2019). Teacher educators' use of digital tools and needs for digital competence in higher education. Journal of Digital Learning n Teacher Education, 35(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Далгатов, М. М., Магомедханова, У. Ш., Кимпаева, Э. А., и Гунашева, М. А. (2022). Психолого-педагогические проблемы дистанционного обучения в представлениях учителей и родителей. Российский психологический журнал, 19(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.2.6</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barrios, T. (2021). Teaching competencies for the 21st century. Academia letters, 3183. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3183</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зеер, Э. Ф., Ломовцева, Н. В., и Третьякова, В. С. (2020). Готовность преподавателей вуза к онлайн-образованию: цифровая компетентность, опыт исследования. Педагогическое образование в России, 3, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.26170/po20-03-03</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Becker, S., Pasquini, L., &amp; Zentner, A. (2017). 2017 Digital literacy impact study: An NMC horizon project strategic brief. The New Media Consortium.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Исаева, Т. Е. (2021). Компетенции и «электронная» педагогическая культура преподавателя высшей школы в постпандемическом мире. Высшее образование в России, 30(6), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-6-80-96</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belousova, A., Yamanova, N., &amp; Sinchenko, T. (2021). The relationship between the features of figurative and logical thinking and learning difficulties. E3S Web of Conferences, 258, 07068. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125807068</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Микиденко, Н. Л., и Сторожева, С. П. (2021). Цифровые технологии в образовании: возможности и риски, преимущества и ограничения. Профессиональное образование в современном мире, 11(1). 23–34. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-1-12</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burganova, L. A., &amp; Yurieva, O. V. (2021). The preparedness of university teachers to work in a digital educational environment: A competence-based approach. The Review of Economy, the Law and Sociology, 2, 67–72. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пучкова, Е. Б., Темнова, Л. В., Сорокоумова, Е. А., и Чердымова, Е. И. (2020). Готовность преподавателей вузов к дистанционной работе в период пандемии COVID-19. Перспективы науки и образования, 6(48), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.6.8</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Cabero-Almenara, J., Romero-Tena, R., &amp; Palacios Rodríguez, A. (2020). Evaluation of teacher digital competence frameworks through expert judgement: The use of the expert competence coefficient. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.578</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Роберт, И. В. (2020а). Дидактика периода цифровой трансформации образования. Мир психологии, 3(103), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.51944/2073-8528_2020_3_184</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., &amp; Punie, Y. (2017). The digital competence framework for citizens: With eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/836968</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Роберт, И. В. (2020б). Цифровая трансформация образования: вызовы и возможности совершенствования. Информатизация образования и науки, 3(47), 3–16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Choudaha, R., &amp; Rest, E. (2018). Megatrends shaping the future of global higher education and international student mobility. Envisioning Pathways to 2030. Study portals.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Смирнова, Н. В. (2023). Мотивация студентов-психологов: роль контента масс медиа-психологов в ее формировании. Северо-Кавказский психологический вестник, 21(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.21702/ncpb.2023.1.4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Christ, W. G., &amp; Potter, W. (1998). Media literacy, media education and the academy. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1460-2466.1998.TB02733.X</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Amhag, L., Hellström, L., &amp; Stigmar, M. (2019). Teacher educators' use of digital tools and needs for digital competence in higher education. Journal of Digital Learning n Teacher Education, 35(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dalgatov, M.  M., Magomedkhanova, U.  Sh., Kimpaeva, E.  A., Gunasheva, M.  A.  (2022).  Psychological and pedagogical problems of distance learning in the views of teachers and parents. Russian Psychological Journal, 19(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.2.6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barrios, T. (2021). Teaching competencies for the 21st century. Academia letters, 3183. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3183</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Efremova, N., &amp; Huseynova, A. (2021). The impact of digital technology on learning motivation and learning modes. E3S Web of Conferences, 273, 12083. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127312083</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Becker, S., Pasquini, L., &amp; Zentner, A. (2017). 2017 Digital literacy impact study: An NMC horizon project strategic brief. The New Media Consortium.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Efremova, N., Shapovalova, O., &amp; Huseynova, A. (2020). Innovative technologies for the formation and competencies and skills assessment XXI century. E3S Web of Conferences, 210, 18021. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021018021</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Belousova, A., Yamanova, N., &amp; Sinchenko, T. (2021). The relationship between the features of figurative and logical thinking and learning difficulties. E3S Web of Conferences, 258, 07068. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125807068</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Cabero-Almenara, J., Romero-Tena, R., &amp; Palacios Rodríguez, A. (2020). Evaluation of teacher digital competence frameworks through expert judgement: The use of the expert competence coefficient. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.578</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Harrison, C. (2017). Defining and seeking to identify critical Internet literacy: A discourse analysis of fifth-graders' Internet search and evaluation activity. Literacy, 52(7). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lit.12136</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., &amp; Punie, Y. (2017). The digital competence framework for citizens: With eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/836968</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Isaeva, T. E. (2021). Higher school teacher’s competences and «electronic» pedagogical culture in the post-pandemic world. Higher Education Pedagogy, 30(6), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-6-80-96 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Choudaha, R., &amp; Rest, E. (2018). Megatrends shaping the future of global higher education and international student mobility. Envisioning Pathways to 2030. Study portals.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Janssen, J., Stoyanov, S., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., Pannekeet, K., &amp; Sloep, P. (2013). Experts’ views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences. Computers &amp; Education, 68(1), 473–481.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Christ, W. G., &amp; Potter, W. (1998). Media literacy, media education and the academy. Journal of Communication, 48(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1460-2466.1998.TB02733.X</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kingpen, T. (2015).  Digital literacy 21st century competencies for our age: The building blocks of digital literacy from enhancement to transformation. Universitas Riau.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Efremova, N., Shapovalova, O., &amp; Huseynova, A. (2020). Innovative technologies for the formation and competencies and skills assessment XXI century. E3S Web of Conferences, 210, 18021. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021018021</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., &amp; Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Efremova, N., &amp; Huseynova, A. (2021). The impact of digital technology on learning motivation and learning modes. E3S Web of Conferences, 273, 12083. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127312083</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lankshear, C., &amp; Knobel, M. (2015). Digital literacy and digital literacies: policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 4, 8–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-02</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Law, N., Woo, D., Torre, J., &amp; Wong, G. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator.  UNESCO Institute for statistics.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Harrison, C. (2017). Defining and seeking to identify critical Internet literacy: A discourse analysis of fifth-graders' Internet search and evaluation activity. Literacy, 52(7). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lit.12136</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lin, M. H., Chen, H. C., &amp; Liu, K. S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553–3564. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Janssen, J., Stoyanov, S., Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., Pannekeet, K., &amp; Sloep, P. (2013). Experts’ views on digital competence: Commonalities and differences. Computers &amp; Education, 68(1), 473–481.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Meskhi, B., Gerasin, P., &amp; Efremova, N. (2021). Psychological and pedagogical aspects of the development of engineering competencies of students. E3S Web of Conferences, 273, 12008.  https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127312008</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kingpen, T. (2015). Digital literacy 21st century competencies for our age: The building blocks of digital literacy from enhancement to transformation. Universitas Riau.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mikidenko, N. L., &amp; Storozheva, S. P. (2021). Digital technologies in education: Opportunities and risks, advantages and limitations. Professional Education in the Modern World, 11(1). 23–34. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-1-12 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., &amp; Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mills, K. A., &amp; Unsworth, L. (2017). Multimodal literacy. Technology and education, languages and literacies, 32. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.232</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lankshear, C., &amp; Knobel, M. (2015). Digital literacy and digital literacies: policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 4, 8–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2015-Jubileumsnummer-02</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mironenko, E. S. (2019). Digital educational environment: Concept and structure. Social space, 4(21), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15838/sa.2019.4.21.6</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Law, N., Woo, D., Torre, J., &amp; Wong, G. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator. UNESCO Institute for statistics.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Oliveira, M. M. S., Penedo, A. S. T., &amp; Pereira, V. S.  (2018). Distance education: Advantages and disadvantages of the point of view of education and society. Dialogia, São Paulo, 2, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.5585/Dialogia.n29.7661</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lin, M. H., Chen, H. C., &amp; Liu, K. S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553–3564. http://dx.doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Puchkova, E. B., Temnova, L. V., Sorokoumova, E. A., &amp; Chardymova, E. I. (2020). University professors ready to work remotely implement distance learning during the COVID 19 pandemic. Perspectives of Science and Education, 6(48), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.32744/pse.2020.6.8 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Meskhi, B., Gerasin, P., &amp; Efremova, N. (2021). Psychological and pedagogical aspects of the development of engineering competencies of students. E3S Web of Conferences, 273, 12008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127312008</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rapanta, Ch., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., &amp; Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mills, K. A., &amp; Unsworth, L. (2017). Multimodal literacy. Technology and education, languages and literacies, 32. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.232</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Redecker, C. (2017).  European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu). Publications Office. http://dx.doi.org/10.2760/159770</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit32"><label>32</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mironenko, E. S. (2019). Digital educational environment: Concept and structure. Social space, 4(21), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15838/sa.2019.4.21.6</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robert, I. V. (2020a). Didactics of the digital transformation of education. World of Psychology, 3(103), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.51944/2073-8528_2020_3_184 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit33"><label>33</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Oliveira, M. M. S., Penedo, A. S. T., &amp; Pereira, V. S. (2018). Distance education: Advantages and disadvantages of the point of view of education and society. Dialogia, São Paulo, 2, 139–152. https://doi.org/10.5585/Dialogia.n29.7661</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Robert, I. V. (2020b). Digital transformation of education: Challenges and prospects. Informatization of Education and Science, 3(47), 3–16. (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit34"><label>34</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rapanta, Ch., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., &amp; Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rubio, C., Carlos, J., Gassó, H., &amp; Bård, H. (2019). Digital competence for teachers: Perspectives and foresights for a new school. Comunicar, 61(4), 1–3.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit35"><label>35</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu). Publications Office. http://dx.doi.org/10.2760/159770</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Santos, C.,  Pedro, N., &amp; Mattar, J. (2021). Digital competence of higher education professors: Analysis of academic and institutional factors. OBRA DIGITAL, 21, 69–92. https://doi.org/10.25029/od.2021.311.21</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit36"><label>36</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rubio, C., Carlos, J., Gassó, H., &amp; Bård, H. (2019). Digital competence for teachers: Perspectives and foresights for a new school. Comunicar, 61(4), 1–3.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tsai, M.-J. (2002). Do male students often perform better than female students when Learning computers? A study of Taiwanese eighth graders’ computer education through strategic and cooperative learning. Educational Computing Research, 26(1), 67–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/9JW6-VV1P-FAX8-CGE0</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit37"><label>37</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Santos, C., Pedro, N., &amp; Mattar, J. (2021). Digital competence of higher education professors: Analysis of academic and institutional factors. OBRA DIGITAL, 21, 69–92. https://doi.org/10.25029/od.2021.311.21</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wardoyo, C., Firmansyah, R., Nuris, D., &amp; Wicaksono, M. (2020). Contribution of teacher competence (pedagogy and personality) in teaching practice during the covid-19 pandemic and 4.0 era. Social Sciences Journal. Technium Science, 14(1), 66–78.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit38"><label>38</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Smirnova N.V. (2023). Motivation of psychology students: the role of the accumulation of media psychologists in its fruits. North-Caucasian Psychological Bulletin, 21(1), 39–48. (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21702/ncpb.2023.1.4</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yavich, R., &amp; Starichenko, B. (2017). Design of education methods in a virtual environment. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(9), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i9.2613</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit39"><label>39</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tsai, M.-J. (2002). Do male students often perform better than female students when Learning computers? A study of Taiwanese eighth graders’ computer education through strategic and cooperative learning. Educational Computing Research, 26(1), 67–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/9JW6-VV1P-FAX8-CGE0</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zeer, E. P., Lomovtceva, N. V., &amp; Tretyakova, V. S. (2020). University teachers’ readiness for online education: Digital competence, research experience. Pedagogical Education in Russia, 3, 26–39. https://doi.org/10.26170/po20-03-03 (In Russ.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit40"><label>40</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wardoyo, C., Firmansyah, R., Nuris, D., &amp; Wicaksono, M. (2020). Contribution of teacher competence (pedagogy and personality) in teaching practice during the covid-19 pandemic and 4.0 era. Social Sciences Journal. Technium Science, 14(1), 66–78.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). The information service environment: Relationships and priorities. Washington, DC.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit41"><label>41</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Yavich, R., &amp; Starichenko, B. (2017). Design of education methods in a virtual environment. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(9), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i9.2613</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Yavich, R., &amp; Starichenko, B. (2017). Design of education methods in a virtual environment. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(9), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i9.2613</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit42"><label>42</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). The information service environment: Relationships and priorities. Washington, DC.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zurkowski, P. G. (1974). The information service environment: Relationships and priorities. Washington, DC.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
