<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">inppd</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Инновационная наука: Психология. Педагогика. Дефектология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2658-7165</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Don State Technical University - DSTU, Rostov-on-Don, Russia</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23947/2658-7165-2023-6-6-35-43</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">inppd-236</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ОБЩАЯ ПСИХОЛОГИЯ, ПСИХОЛОГИЯ ЛИЧНОСТИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Связь функциональных ролей и их психологических предикторов при решении двигательных задач в совместной мыслительной деятельности</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>The Relationship of Functional Roles and their Psychological Predictors in Solving Motor Tasks in Joint Mental Activity</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7506-3749</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Белоусова</surname><given-names>А. К.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Belousova</surname><given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Алла Константиновна Белоусова, доктор психологических наук, профессор, профессор кафедры психологии образования и организационной психологии</p><p>344000, г. Ростов-на-Дону, пл. Гагарина, 1</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Alla Konstantinovna Belousova, Dr. Sci. (Psychology), Professor, Professor of the Department of Educational Psychology and Organizational Psychology</p><p>1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">belousovaak@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4309-0253</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Качан</surname><given-names>Ю. М.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kachan</surname><given-names>Ju. M.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Юлия Михайловна Качан, заместитель декана</p><p>125315, г. Москва, Ленинградский проспект, 80Г</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Yulia Mikhailovna Kachan, Deputy Dean</p><p>80G, Leningradsky Prospekt, Moscow, 125315</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">yuliyakachan@rambler.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Донской государственный технический университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Don State Technical University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский финансово-промышленный университет «Синергия»</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Moscow University of Industrial Finance (SINERGIA)</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>05</day><month>03</month><year>2024</year></pub-date><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>35</fpage><lpage>43</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Белоусова А.К., Качан Ю.М., 2024</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2024</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Белоусова А.К., Качан Ю.М.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Belousova A.K., Kachan J.M.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.inov-ppd.ru/jour/article/view/236">https://www.inov-ppd.ru/jour/article/view/236</self-uri><abstract><sec><title>Введение</title><p>Введение. Современное общество требует от молодых специалистов нестандартных способов решения различных задач в команде. Несмотря на высокий интерес к проблеме совместного мышления, существует недостаточное количество комплексных исследований психологических предикторов, участвующих в формировании функциональных ролей участников совместной мыслительной деятельности. Цель. Анализ взаимосвязи функциональных ролей и их психологических предикторов при решении двигательных задач в совместной мыслительной деятельности.</p></sec><sec><title>Материалы и методы</title><p>Материалы и методы. В исследовании приняли участие 208 человек – студенты гуманитарных и технических специальностей ЮФУ в возрасте от 17 до 21 года. Группы для решения задачи состояли из четырех испытуемых. Для решения была использована двигательная задача под условным названием «Блоки». Для сбора данных использовались методики: 16-факторный личностный опросник Кеттелла; методика определения копинг-поведения в стрессовых ситуациях; методика «Направленность личности»; мотивация избегания неудач Элерса; мотивация к успеху Элерса; САМОАЛ; диагностика вербальной креативности; тест эвристической компетенции; опросник для определения контроля за действием; анкета «Методика оценки участниками подгрупп партнеров с точки зрения выполнения ими функций самоорганизации совместной мыслительной деятельности». Применен коэффициент корреляции Пирсона.</p></sec><sec><title>Результаты исследования</title><p>Результаты исследования. Наименее выражена функция генерации, что свидетельствует о слабой активности носителей данной функциональной роли при решении задачи двигательного типа. Наиболее выражена функция смыслопередачи, что говорит о сосредоточении на согласовании целей участников мыслительной деятельности для достижения общего результата при решении двигательной задачи, нежели на выдвижении новых гипотез.</p></sec><sec><title>Обсуждение результатов</title><p>Обсуждение результатов. Анализируя распределение ролей, их функциональное содержание, становится возможным непосредственно увидеть реализацию особенностей мыслительной деятельности, осуществляемой совместно, оценить структуру интеллектуальной деятельности когнитивного взаимодействия членов группы, лучше понять процессуальные особенности совместной мыслительной деятельности. Подчеркивается взаимосвязь личностных особенностей участников решения задач с функционально-ролевым распределением в совместном мышлении, а также необходимость комплексного исследования принятия и воплощения ролей участниками группы.</p></sec></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction</title><p>Introduction. Modern society demands from young professionals non-standard ways of solving various tasks in a team. Despite the high interest in the problem of joint thinking, there is an insufficient number of comprehensive studies of psychological predictors involved in the formation of functional roles of participants in joint mental activity. Purpose. Analysis of the relationship between functional roles and their psychological predictors in solving motor tasks in joint mental activity.</p></sec><sec><title>Materials and methods</title><p>Materials and methods. The study involved 208 people: they are students of humanities and technical specialties of the Southern Federal University aged 17 to 21 years. The task groups consisted of four subjects. For the solution, a motor task was used under the conditional name “Blocks”. To collect the data, the following methods were used: Kettell’s 16-factor personality questionnaire; a method for determining coping behavior in stressful situations; the “Personality orientation” method; Ehlers’ motivation for avoiding failures; Ehlers’ motivation for success; SELF-assessment; diagnosis of verbal creativity; heuristic competence test; a questionnaire for determining action control; the questionnaire “Methodology of assessment by participants of subgroups of partners from the point of view of their performance of functions of selforganization of joint mental activity”. The Pearson correlation coefficient is applied.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Results. The generation function is the least pronounced, which indicates a weak activity of carriers of this functional role in solving a motor-type problem. The function of semantic transmission is most pronounced, which indicates a focus on coordinating the goals of participants in mental activity to achieve a common result in solving a motor task, rather than on putting forward new hypotheses.</p></sec><sec><title>Discussion</title><p>Discussion. Analyzing the distribution of roles, their functional content, it becomes possible to directly see the implementation of the features of mental activity carried out jointly, to assess the structure of intellectual activity of cognitive interaction of group members, to better understand the procedural features of joint mental activity. The interrelation of the personal characteristics of the participants in solving problems with the functional role distribution in joint thinking is emphasized, as well as the need for a comprehensive study of the acceptance and embodiment of roles by group members.</p></sec></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>совместная мыслительная деятельность</kwd><kwd>функционально-ролевое распределение</kwd><kwd>генерация</kwd><kwd>селекция</kwd><kwd>реализация</kwd><kwd>смыслопередача</kwd><kwd>психологические предикторы</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>joint mental activity</kwd><kwd>functional role distribution</kwd><kwd>generation</kwd><kwd>selection</kwd><kwd>realization</kwd><kwd>semantic transmission</kwd><kwd>psychological predictors</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Белоусова, А. К. (2002). Самоорганизация совместной мыслительной деятельности. РГПУ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Akyol, Z., &amp; Garrison, D. R. (2013). Educational Communities of Inquiry: Theoretical Framework, Research and Practice. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Белоусова, А. К., и Качан, Ю. М. (2012). Мотивационные детерминанты принятия студентами функциональных ролей в процессе решения задач. Психология обучения, 9, 65–73.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belousova, A. (2020). Functions of participants in the collaborative solution of thinking problems. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 8(SI), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-si-29-36</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Боно, Э. (2005). Развитие мышления: Три пятидневных курса. Попурри.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belousova, A. K., &amp; Kachan, Y. M. (2012). Motivational determinants of students’ acceptance of functional roles in the process of solving problems. Psychology of learning, 9, 65–73.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Воронин, А. Н., и Горюнова, Н. Б. (2014). Влияние межличностных отношений на эффективность совместной интеллектуальной деятельности студентов. Психология обучения, 8, 60–71.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual review of sociology, 12(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000435</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гаджиев, Ч. М. (1983). Организация коллективного изобретательства. В Я. А. Пономарев (ред). Исследование проблем психологии творчества: коллективная монография (С. 266–279). Наука.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brush, T. A. (1998) Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: Rationale and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02299758</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Данилова, В. Л. (2007). Субъект поступка в пространстве организационно-деятельностной игры. Человек.RU, 3, 105–130.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Danilova, V. L. (2007). The subject of an act in the space of an organizational and activity game. Human.RU, 3, 105–130.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Даутов, Д. Ф. (2010). Творческие способности и функциональные роли участников совместной мыслительной деятельности (кандидатская диссертация). Ростов-на-Дону.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dautov, D.F., Lomova, N.V., Rashchupkina, Y., Nikolenko, O.F., &amp; Tushnova, J.A. (2019). Cognitive Maps of Participants in Joint Mental Activity. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Science and Social Development (ESSD 2019) (pp. 210–214). Atlantis Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Джакупов, С. М. (2008). Развитие смысловой теории мышления в концепции совместно-диалогической познавательной деятельности. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 14. Психология, 2, 180–188.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dyke, G., Kumar, R., Ai, H., &amp; Rose, C. (2012). Challenging Assumptions: using sliding window visualizations to reveal time-based irregularities in CSCL processes. In van Aalst, J., Thompson, K., Jacobson, M. J., &amp; Reimann, P. (Eds.), The Future of Learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012), Volume 1 (pp. 363–370). International Society of the Learning Sciences.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Иванов, В. В., и Иванова, С. В. (2015). Распределение ролей членов команды проекта, с учетом их психотипов, при использовании эвристических методов. Педагогічні науки: теорія, історія, інноваційні технології, 5, 125–136.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dzhakupov, S. M. (2008) The development of the semantic theory of thinking in the concept of collaborative dialogic cognitive activity. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 2, 180–188.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Качан, Ю. М. (2015). Роль генератора идей в совместной мыслительной деятельности студентов. Психология обучения, 1, 29–36.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., &amp; Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of distance education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Клочко, В. Е., Галажинский, Э. В. (2000). Самореализация личности: системный взгляд. Издательство Томского университета.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ivanov, V. V., &amp; Ivanova, S. V. (2015). The distribution of the roles of the project team members, taking into account their psychotypes, using heuristic methods. Pedagogical sciences: theory, history, innovative technologies, 5, 125–136.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Крогиус, Н. В. (1976). Личность в конфликте. Издательство Саратовского университета.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kachan, Y. M. (2015). The role of the idea generator in the joint mental activity of students. Psychology of learning, 1, 29–36.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кузнецова, Т. В. (2019). Взаимосвязь мотивации и предпочитаемых командных ролей. Современное образование, 2, 40–51.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kuznetsova, T. V. (2019). The relationship between motivation and preferred team roles. Modern Education, 2, 40–51.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ломов, Б. Ф. (1981). К проблеме деятельности в психологии. Психологический журнал, 2(5), 3–22.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lomov, B. F. (1981). On the problem of activity in psychology. Psychological Journal, 2(5), 3–22.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ляудис, В. Я. (1983). Продуктивная совместная деятельность учителя с учениками как метод формирования личности. В А. А. Бодалев (отв. ред.). Активные методы обучения педагогическому общению и его оптимизации (С. 64–73). АПН СССР.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Matyushkina, A. A. (2022). Intellectual dialogue in creative thinking (based on the analysis of the creation of inventions). Izvestiya of Saratov University. Educational Acmeology. Developmental Psychology, 11(2), 141–153.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Матюшкина, А. А., и Кеберлинская, Ф. С. Г. (2022). Интеллектуальный диалог в творческом мышлении (на материале анализа создания изобретений). Известия Саратовского университета. Новая серия. Серия: Акмеология образования. Психология развития, 11(2(42)), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.18500/2304-9790-2022-11-2-141-153</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mudrack, P. E., &amp; Farrell, G. M. (1995). An examination of functional role behavior and its consequences for individuals in group settings. Small Group Research, 26(4), 542–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649649526400</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Обозов, Н. Н. (1981). Психические процессы и функции в условиях индивидуальной и совместной деятельности. В Б. Ф. Ломов (ред.). Проблема общения в психологии (С. 24–44). Наука.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pronenko, E. A. (2014). Psychological features of meaning initiation at the initial stage of team building. NorthCaucasian Psychological Bulletin, 12(2), 20–24.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Пономарев, Я. А. (2006) Перспективы развития психологии творчества В Д. В. Ушаков (ред.). Психология творчества: школа Я. А. Пономарева (С. 145–276).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rubtsov, V. V. (1998). Joint educational activities in the context of the problem of the correlation of social interactions and learning. Psychology issues, 5, 49–59.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Проненко, Е. А. (2014). Психологические особенности смыслоинициации на начальном этапе командообразования. Северо-Кавказский психологический вестник, 12(2), 20–24.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaffer, D., &amp; Ruis, A. (2017). Epistemic network analysis: A worked example of theory-based learning analytics. In Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 175–187). https://doi.org/10.18608/hla17.015</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рубцов, В. В. (1998). Совместная учебная деятельность в контексте проблемы соотношения социальных взаимодействий и обучения. Вопросы психологии, 5, 49–59.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Suthers, D. D., &amp; Desiato, C. (2012). Exposing chat features through analysis of uptake between contributions. In 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (С. 3368–3377). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2012.274</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Спиридонов, В. Ф. (2023). Психология мышления. Решение задач и проблем: учебное пособие для вузов. Юрайт. Урбанович, А. А. (2007). Психология управления: учебное пособие. Харвест</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Voronin, A. N., &amp; Goryunova, N. B. (2014). The influence of interpersonal relationships on the effectiveness of students’ joint intellectual activity. Psychology of learning, 8, 60–71.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Akyol, Z., &amp; Garrison, D. R. (2013). Educational Communities of Inquiry: Theoretical Framework, Research and Practice. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Akyol, Z., &amp; Garrison, D. R. (2013). Educational Communities of Inquiry: Theoretical Framework, Research and Practice. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Belousova, A. (2020). Functions of participants in the collaborative solution of thinking problems. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 8(SI), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-si-29-36</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belousova, A. (2020). Functions of participants in the collaborative solution of thinking problems. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 8(SI), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-si-29-36</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual review of sociology, 12(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000435</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual review of sociology, 12(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000435</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Brush, T. A. (1998) Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: Rationale and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02299758</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brush, T. A. (1998) Embedding cooperative learning into the design of integrated learning systems: Rationale and guidelines. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02299758</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dautov, D.F., Lomova, N.V., Rashchupkina, Y., Nikolenko, O.F., &amp; Tushnova, J.A. (2019). Cognitive Maps of Participants in Joint Mental Activity. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Science and Social Development (ESSD 2019) (pp. 210–214). Atlantis Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dautov, D.F., Lomova, N.V., Rashchupkina, Y., Nikolenko, O.F., &amp; Tushnova, J.A. (2019). Cognitive Maps of Participants in Joint Mental Activity. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education Science and Social Development (ESSD 2019) (pp. 210–214). Atlantis Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Dyke, G., Kumar, R., Ai, H., &amp; Rose, C. (2012). Challenging Assumptions: using sliding window visualizations to reveal time-based irregularities in CSCL processes. In van Aalst, J., Thompson, K., Jacobson, M. J., &amp; Reimann, P. (Eds.), The Future of Learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012), Volume 1 (pp. 363–370). International Society of the Learning Sciences.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Dyke, G., Kumar, R., Ai, H., &amp; Rose, C. (2012). Challenging Assumptions: using sliding window visualizations to reveal time-based irregularities in CSCL processes. In van Aalst, J., Thompson, K., Jacobson, M. J., &amp; Reimann, P. (Eds.), The Future of Learning: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2012), Volume 1 (pp. 363–370). International Society of the Learning Sciences.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., &amp; Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of distance education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., &amp; Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of distance education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit29"><label>29</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mudrack, P. E., &amp; Farrell, G. M. (1995). An examination of functional role behavior and its consequences for individuals in group settings. Small Group Research, 26(4), 542–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649649526400</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mudrack, P. E., &amp; Farrell, G. M. (1995). An examination of functional role behavior and its consequences for individuals in group settings. Small Group Research, 26(4), 542–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649649526400</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit30"><label>30</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shaffer, D., &amp; Ruis, A. (2017). Epistemic network analysis: A worked example of theory-based learning analytics. In Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 175–187). https://doi.org/10.18608/hla17.015</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shaffer, D., &amp; Ruis, A. (2017). Epistemic network analysis: A worked example of theory-based learning analytics. In Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 175–187). https://doi.org/10.18608/hla17.015</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit31"><label>31</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Suthers, D. D., &amp; Desiato, C. (2012). Exposing chat features through analysis of uptake between contributions. In 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 3368–3377). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2012.274</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Suthers, D. D., &amp; Desiato, C. (2012). Exposing chat features through analysis of uptake between contributions. In 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 3368–3377). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2012.274</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
