Value-Motivational Sphere of Postgraduates in Higher Education Institutions: Review of Studies

Introduction. Graduate students constitute a key intellectual resource for the development of science; however, the proportion of dissertations defended within the normative time frame remains low. The relevance of this article lies in the need to systematize research on the value–motivational sphere and self-organization of graduate students and to examine their relationship with resilience to institutional challenges.
Objective. To describe the value–motivational sphere of graduate students as a key component of their psychological readiness for research activity in the context of the transformation of the Russian postgraduate education model.
Institutional challenges and barriers to graduate students’ motivation. Russian postgraduate education is developing under conditions of declining prestige of academic careers, high academic workload, massification, and the possibility of completing programs without defending a dissertation. Along with insufficient research training, limited funding, and a lack of high-quality supervision, these factors can weaken motivation for scientific work and contribute to graduate students’ departure from academia.
Motives for entering postgraduate programs and choosing an academic trajectory. Enrolment in postgraduate programs is determined by a combination of intrinsic motives (interest in research, aspiration for scientific activity, self-realization) and extrinsic factors (career prospects, prestige, etc.). The supervisor’s role, teaching opportunities, and involvement in the academic community often become turning points in choosing and revising one’s academic trajectory.
The value–motivational sphere of graduate students during postgraduate study. The value structure combines an orientation toward self-actualization (intellectual development, creative and professional self-realization) with a focus on competitiveness (career, material well-being), while family and health remain core life priorities. Intrinsic and autonomous motivation, grounded in genuine interest in research and the value of scientific activity, is a key factor in the sustainable continuation of postgraduate study.
Self-organization and self-regulation as factors of successful completion. Successful completion of postgraduate programs is associated with goal-setting, planning, task prioritization, time management, reflexive evaluation of intermediate results, and adjustment of one’s research strategy. Graduate students who complete their studies successfully tend to demonstrate higher levels of independence, organization, result orientation, and tolerance for uncertainty.
Discussion. The success of postgraduate trajectories is determined by the interaction between institutional conditions and personal resources of graduate students, including motivation, value orientations, self-organization, and the capacity for informed academic career choice. The coherence of this interaction ensures resilience to institutional barriers, supports engagement in research, and increases the likelihood of completing postgraduate study within the normative time frame.

1. Abakumova, I. V. (2010). Meaning-centered didactics: A textbook for master’s students in psychology and pedagogy. Kredo. (In Russ.).

2. Atamanova, I. V., Starichenko, O. N., & Bogomaz, S. A. (2013). Psychological features of master’s and doctoral students at universities oriented toward classical and engineering education. Tomsk State University Journal, 367, 128–135. (In Russ.).

3. Bekova, S. K., & Dzhafarova, Z. I. K. (2019). Who is happy in doctoral programs: The relationship between PhD students’ employment and learning outcomes. Voprosy obrazovaniya, (1), 87–108. (In Russ.).

4. Bokhan, T. G., Shabalovskaya, M. V., Galazhinskaya, O. N., & Atamanova, I. V. (2019). Value development as an indicator of personal readiness for self-realization among early-career researchers. Integration of Education, 23(2), 208–231. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.095.023.201902.208-231 (In Russ.).

5. Bokhan, T. G., Shabalovskaya, M. V., Galazhinskaya, O. N., Uliyanich, A. L., Shukhlova, Y. A., & Zaikina, M. D. (2016). Psychological barriers in research activity of young scientists. Siberian Journal of Psychology, 62, 81–95. https://doi.org/10.17223/17267080/62/7 (In Russ.).

6. Bokhan, T. G., Shabalovskaya, M. V., Malkova, I. Y., Galazhinskaya, O. N., & Radishevskaya, L. V. (2017). Coping strategies with difficulties in research activity among young scientists. Integration of Education, 21(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.086.021.201701.071-085 (In Russ.).

7. Filonik, M. S. (2009). On the justification of the concept of “personally significant choice”. Psychological Science and Education, 14(5), 117–124.

8. Grigoryeva, A. V., & Terentev, E. A. (2021). Doctoral students’ academic supervision: A systematic review of approaches to conceptualization and empirical analysis. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 25(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.01.004 (In Russ.).

9. Guo, Y., & Liu, X. (2026). Mental Health and Well-Being of Doctoral Students: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.32604/ijmhp.2025.074063

10. Gusy, B., Lesener, T., & Wolter, C. (2021). Time pressure and health-related loss of productivity in university students: the mediating role of exhaustion. Frontiers in public health, 9, 653440. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.653440

11. Hutmacher, D., Eckelt, M., Bund, A., Melzer, A., & Steffgen, G. (2022). Uncovering the role of mindfulness in autonomous motivation across physical education and leisure time: Extending the trans-contextual model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 12999. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192012999

12. Ivanov, A. Y. (2015). Positive and negative aspects of postgraduate study. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya obrazovaniya v Rossii, 34, 233–237. (In Russ.). (In Russ.).

13. Kapshutar, M. A. (2016). Motivation as a factor in the quality of postgraduate training. Tsennosti i smysly, 5(45), 39–47. (In Russ.).

14. Kapshutar, M. A. (2020). Axiological aspect of developing postgraduate students’ research competence. Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya Severo-Zapada Rossii, 6(2). (In Russ.).

15. Karavaeva, E. V., Kostenko, O. A., Malandin, V. V., & Mosicheva, I. A. (2022). PhD programs as a basic tool of human capacity building in Russian science. Higher Education in Russia, 31(1), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-1-9-23 (In Russ.).

16. Kostromina, S. N., & Latushkina, V. M. (2013). Psychological factors of postgraduates’ self-organization. Credo New, (1), 11. (In Russ.).

17. Kovba, D. M., & Gribovod, E. G. (2022). Russian postgraduate studies in the face of modern challenges. Vestnik Udmurtskogo universiteta. Seriya Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Pedagogika, 32(3), 289–296. https://doi.org/10.35634/2412-9550-2022-32-3-289-296 (In Russ.).

18. Labyntseva, I. S. (2021). Features of motivation for research activity among modern postgraduate students. Voprosy pedagogiki, (6-1), 210–216. (In Russ.).

19. Leontiev, D. A., & Pham, A. H. (2011). How we choose: The structures of subjective experience of choice and their connections with personality variables. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya, (1), 39–53. (In Russ.).

20. Litalien, D., & Guay, F. (2015). Dropout intentions in PhD studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 218-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.004

21. Liu, S., Liu, Y., & Ni, Y. (2018). A review of mindfulness improves decision making and future prospects. Psychology, 9(2), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2018.92015

22. Lyz, N. A., & Labyntseva, I. S. (2019). Specifics of postgraduate training: The role of motivation. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Higher Education Issues, (1), 68–72. (In Russ.).

23. Marchuk, L. A. (2025). Academic supervision style as a predictor of PhD students’ motivation and burnout. Psychological Science and Education, 30(3), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2025300308 (In Russ.).

24. Marchuk, L. A., & Gordeeva, T. O. (2024). What determines satisfaction with graduate school and intentions to complete it among modern PhD students? Psychological Science and Education, 29(4), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2024290401 (In Russ.).

25. Mikhalkina, E. V., Skachkova, L. S., & Gerasimova, O. Y. (2019). Academic or non-academic career: What choice do graduates of federal universities make? Terra Economicus, 17(4), 148–173. https://doi.org/10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-4-148-173 (In Russ.).

26. Milovanova, G. V., Kulyashova, N. M., & Shemyakina, E. Y. (2022). Comparative analysis of motivational characteristics of students at different stages of study. Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal “Koncept”, (6), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.24412/2304-120X-2022-11043 (In Russ.).

27. Mironov, A. A., Bednyi, B. I., & Rybakov, N. V. (2017). Academic careers in the spectrum of postgraduate students’ professional preferences. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 21(3), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2017.03.039 (In Russ.).

28. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

29. Sobkin, V. S., & Smyslova, M. M. (2020). Features of motivation for entering postgraduate study. Pedagogika, 84(7), 36–44. (In Russ.).

30. Sobkin, V. S., Smyslova, M. M., & Adamchuk, D. V. (2021). Socio-psychological features of value orientations in postgraduate students. National Psychological Journal, 14(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2021.0104 (In Russ.).

31. Terentev, E. A., Bekova, S. K., & Maloshonok, N. G. (2018). The crisis of postgraduate studies in Russia: What causes problems and how to overcome them. University Management: Practice and Analysis, 22(5), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2018.05.049 (In Russ.).

32. Terentev, E. A., Kuzminov, Y. I., & Froumin, I. D. (2021). Science without youth? The crisis of postgraduate education and ways to overcome it. Sovremennaya analitika obrazovaniya, 6(55), 4–46. (In Russ.).

33. Terentev, E., Rybakov, N., & Bednyi, B. (2020). Why embark on a PhD today? A typology of motives for doctoral study in Russia. Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, (1), 40–69. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2020-1-40-69

34. Tikkanen, L., Pyhältö, K., Bujacz, A., & Nieminen, J. (2021). Study engagement and burnout of the PhD candidates in medicine: A person-centered approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 727746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727746

35. Tokatligil, Y. S. (2017). Predictors of scientific research success: Analysis of domestic research. Mir nauki. Pedagogika i psikhologiya, 5(4), 19.

36. Vafa, Z., Azizi, M., & Elhami Athar, M. (2021). Predicting academic alienation from emotion dysregulation, social competence, and peer relationships in school-attending girls: a multiple-regression approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 755952. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.755952

37. Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., Man, K., & Lu, J. (2025). Fostering autonomous motivation in first-year college students: A self-determination theory-based online intervention. Learning and Motivation, 90, 102118.

38. Weinstein, N., Haddock, G., Chubb, J., Wilsdon, J., & Manville, C. (2023). Supported or stressed while being assessed? How motivational climates in UK University workplaces promote or inhibit researcher well-being. Higher Education Quarterly, 77(3), 537–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12420

39. Zamaraeva, I. V. (2013). Social portrait of modern post-graduate student in Russia. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniya: ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny, 5(117), 152–158. (In Russ.).