Preview

Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology

Advanced search

Methods of evidence-based argumentation of competence assessment

Abstract

The article presents a new look at the problem of assessing students' competencies. The section "Introduction" describes the problems of ensuring the reliability of the results of assessing competencies that currently exist in the vocational education system. The distinctive features of competencies that must be taken into account when developing and using assessment tools to identify their development are shown. It is noted that the difficulties of the assessment process are primarily due to the complex structure and deep latency of competencies. In the section "Theoretical substantiation", based on the research of a number of foreign authors, the novelty of the method of designing assessment tools and processes based on the principle of evidence-based argumentation for obtaining factual data on learning outcomes is shown. The conceptual basis of evidence-based argumentation using the Evidencebased Assessment method is based on the sequential development of a number of assessment models: construct, assignment, assembly, statistical processing of results and their interpretation. An important condition for the manifestation of competencies is the planned activity of the subjects in the assessment situation. In the section "Discussion of the results" it is noted that in domestic education the models of evidence-based comprehensive assessment of students' competencies, which ensure high reliability and validity of the results, have not yet found wide application. The approach proposed in the article can be useful for teachers of the higher education system when planning the results of mastering educational programs and using scientifically based methods for constructing means of assessing the cognitive and competence achievements of students. In the conclusion, the conclusion is formulated that the proposed method of using models of evidence-based argumentation can contribute to the further development of control and assessment activities to reduce errors in the assessment and obtain data that contribute to improving the quality of training in a competence-based approach.

About the Author

N. F. Efremova
Don state technical University
Russian Federation

Nadezhda F. Efremova

Rostov-on-Don



References

1. Armstrong, S., Chan, S., Malfroy, J., Thomson, R. (2015). Assessment Guide Implementing criteria and standards-based assessment. Sydney: University of Western Sydney.

2. Baartman, L., Gulikers, T. (2014). Assessment as the cornerstone of high quality vocational education: An analysis of 11 assessment programs in senior secondary and higher vocational education. Pedagogische Studien, 91(1), 54–68.

3. Bennett, R. E. (2018). Educational Assessment: What to Watch in a Rapidly Changing World. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(1), 5–12.

4. Biggs, J., Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.

5. Boyatzis, R. E. (2008). Competencies in the 21st century. Journal of Management Development, 27(1), 5–12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02621710810840730

6. Care, E., Scoular, C., Griffin, P. (2016). Assessment of Collaborative Problem Solving in Education Environments. Applied Measurement in Education. 29(4), 250–264, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209204

7. Care, E., Griffin, P., Wilson, M. (2018). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Research and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6

8. Care, E. (2020). Assessment as a Stimulus for Scaling 21st Century Skills in Education Systems. Brookings Institution.

9. Davletkaliyeva, Y. S., Muldasheva, B. K., Izteleuova, Z. S., Kulbaeva, B. S., Satova, D. E. (2015). Criteria-Based Assessment as a Method of Qualitative Development of Teaching and Learning Process. International Journal of Applied and Fundamental Research. 3. URL: www.science-sd.com/462-24947

10. Efremova, N. F., Meskhi, B. Ch., Shvedova, S. V. (2019). Quality assurance in the context of european integration. Journal of supranational policies of education, 10, 40–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.15366/jospoe2019.10.003

11. Efremova, N. F. Huseynova, А. А. Shvedova, S. V. (2019). The influence of assessment on learning motivation. In Trends in the development of psychological and pedagogical education in a transitive society. Proceedings of the SHS Web Conf. Trends in the Development of Psycho-Pedagogical Education in the Conditions of Transitional Society. 04003. Les Ulis: EDP Sciences. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20197004003

12. Efremova, N. F. (2018). Argumentation and evidence of the reliability of assessments of students' competencies. Izvestiya Dagestanskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki = Izvestia of the Dagestan State Pedagogical University. Psychological and pedagogical sciences, 12(2), 43–50. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.31161/1995-0659-2018-12-2-43-50 (in Russ.).

13. Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2006). Relations between student perceptions of assessment authenticity, study approaches and learning outcome. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32(4), 381–400. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2006.10.003

14. Hansen, E.G., Zapata-Rivera, D. et al. (2009). Evidence Centered Design for Developing High-Quality Learning-Centered Assessments. URL: https:// www.researchgate.net/publication/237295116_Evidence_Centered_Design_for_Developing_High-Quality_Learning-Centered_Assessments

15. Hermelin, E., Lievens, F., Robertson, I.T. (2007). The Validity of Assessment Centres for the Prediction of Supervisory Performance Ratings. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(4). 405–411. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00399.x

16. Hunsley, J., Mash, E.J. (2007). Evidence-based assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 3, 29–51. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091419

17. Jenkins, M. M., Youngstrom, E.A., Washburn, J. J. Youngstrom, J. K. (2011). Evidence-Based Strategies Improve Assessment of Pediatric Bipolar Disorder by Community Practitioners. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(2), 121–129. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022506

18. Joshi, V., Parashar, S., Sharma, P. (2019). Evidence Based Assessment - Policy, Principle and Practice Perspective. In World Conference on Research in Education (pp. 29–31). Berlin. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.33422/worldcre.2019.08.459

19. Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., Lukas, J. F. (2003). A Brief Introduction to Evidencecentered Design. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

20. Mislevy, R. J. (2013). Evidence-Centered Design for Simulation-Based Assessment. Military Medicine, 178(10). 107–114. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-13-00213

21. Steglitz, J., Warnick, J. L., Hoffman, S. A., Johnston, W., Spring, B. (2015). Evidence-Based Practice. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition (pp. 332–338). Chicago: Northwestern University. doi: http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10540-9


Review

For citations:


Efremova N.F. Methods of evidence-based argumentation of competence assessment. Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology. 2020;3(2):112-124. (In Russ.)

Views: 210


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-7165 (Online)

Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology

ISSN 2658-7165 (Online)

Contact with: Publisher / Editorial Office of the Journal

Publisher: Don State Technical University - DSTU, Rostov-on-Don, Russia - https://donstu.ru/en/

Editor-in-Chief: Irina V. Abakumova, Dr.Sci. (Psychology), Professor, Don State Technical University (Rostov-on-Don, Russia) 

Don State Technical University
1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003, Russia
tel.: +7(863) 238-13-56, e-mail: inovppd@gmail.com

16+