Internet behavior of primary school children
https://doi.org/10.23947/2658-7165-2021-4-4-40-51
Abstract
The article presents results of the study of primary school children Internet behavior. The possible threats, causes and solutions in the case of addictive behavior are considered. The Introduction shows the social significance of the problem. Internet space influence on the formation of the worldview and the impact on the personal structure of the child are evaluated. The age features of this age group are shown. The causes of addictive behavior are analyzed. The novelty of the study is to present a brief overview of studies on the problem of primary school children Internet behavior. The Theoretical justification analyzes the behavior of younger schoolchildren with the advent of technologization and digitalization. The causes of "dangerous" relationships with the Internet are revealed. Possible threats when using Internet resources by children of primary school age are considered: content, communication, consumer, technical, dependencies. The sources of these threats are indicated. The influence and behavior of younger schoolchildren in these situations is analyzed. This article describes the tasks of parents to prevent this problem and an example of behavior in the event of a problem. In the Discussion of the results, the issue of teaching the skills of safe behavior on the Internet to younger schoolchildren is raised. The necessity of developing methodological materials on this problem is justified. The main psychological and pedagogical conditions for teaching information security to younger schoolchildren are highlighted. In Сonclusion, the trends of the problem of teaching safe behavior of primary school children on the Internet are noted. It is noted that the primary school in our time calls for further study of this issue and the need to develop new forms and methods of teaching to improve the safety of younger students in the network.
About the Authors
M. I. Chumak
Don State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Margarita I. Chumak
Rostov-on-Don
M. Yu. Elagina
Don State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina Yu. Elagina
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Babaeva, Yu. D., & Voiskunsky, A. E. (1998). Psychological consequences of informatization. Psychological Journal, 19(1), 89–100. (in Russ.)
2. Baranov, E. G. (2017). Informational and psychological impact: the essence and psychological content. National Journal of Psychology, 1(25), 25–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.11621/npj.2017.0103 (in Russ.)
3. Belinskaya, E. P. (2009). The relationship between Internet addiction and coping strategies with difficult life situations. In A. E. Voiskunsky (ed.) Internet addiction: the psychological nature and dynamics of development. Collection of scientific papers (pp. 48–62). Moscow: Akropol’. (in Russ.)
4. Bochaver, A. A., & Khlomov, K. D. (2013). Bullying as an object of research and a cultural phenomenon. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 10(3), 149–159. (in Russ.)
5. Bukina, E. Yu. (2014). Formation of skills of safe work in the Internet for younger schoolchildren. Computer Science at School, 5(98), 40–49. (in Russ.)
6. Feldstein, D. I. (2010). A changing child in a changing world: psychological and pedagogical problems of a new school. National Journal of Psychology, 2, 6–11. (in Russ.)
7. Kondrashkin, A. V., Khlomov, K. D. (2012). Deviant behavior of adolescents and the Internet: changing the social situation. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 9(3), 102–113. (in Russ.)
8. Makarova, E. A., Makarova, E. L., Mahrina, E. A. (2016). Psychological features of cyberbullying as a form of Internet crime. Russian Psychological Journal, 13(3), 293–311. doi: https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2016.3.17 (in Russ.)
9. Nechaeva, A. Yu. (2021). The impact of the pandemic and distance learning on the mental state of primary school children. Skiff. Questions of Student Science, 5(57), 75–78. (in Russ.)
10. Os’kina, N. G. (2012). Prevention of Internet addiction in primary school children: a new model. Elementary school plus before and after, 7, 17–20. (in Russ.)
11. Soldatova, G., Rasskazova, E., Zotova, E., Lebesheva, M., Roggendorf, P. (2012). Children of Russia online. The results of the international project EU Kids Online II in Russia. URL: http://detionline.com/assets/files/helpline/Final_Report_05-29-11.pdf (accessed: 7/22/2021). (in Russ.)
12. Sourander, A., Klomek, A., Ikonen, M., Lindroos, J., Luntamo, T., Koskeiainen, M., Ristkari, T., & Helenius, H. (2010) Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(7), 720–728. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.79
13. Sparks, G. G. (1986). Developmental differences in children's reports of fear induced by mass media. Child Study Journal, 16(1), 55–66.
14. Widyanto, L., & Griffiths, M. (2006). ‘Internet Addiction’: A Critical Review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 4, 31–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-006-9009-9
15. Zintsova, A. S. (2014). Social prevention of cyberbullying. Vestnik of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. I. Lobachevsky. Series: Social sciencies, 3(35), 122–128. (in Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Chumak M.I., Elagina M.Yu. Internet behavior of primary school children. Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology. 2021;4(4):40-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23947/2658-7165-2021-4-4-40-51
Views:
105
Email this article 