Preview

Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology

Advanced search

The effect of national identity and collective victimhood on south Koreans’ perception of trilateral cooperation

https://doi.org/10.23947/2658-7165-2024-7-6-27-34

EDN: QNVGCW

Abstract

Introduction. Mutual intimacy among the citizens of the three countries – South Korea, Japan, and China – continues to be low. To facilitate trilateral cooperation, it is important to understand public perception towards cooperation. 
Purpose. examines how psychological factors of national identification and collective victimhood affect Koreans’ perception and attitudes toward China and Japan. 
Materials and methods. A survey on 320 participants of Korean nationality was conducted using an online questionnaire to measure national identification, collective victimhood, perceived social norms, and preferences for international policies. 
Results. Descriptive statistics show that while most Koreans perceived anti-Chinese and anti-Japanese sentiments as a social norm, participants held more positive attitudes towards them on a personal level. In addition, participants with lower degrees of national identification and collective victimhood, showed more positive attitudes towards Chinese and Japanese and higher preference for diplomatic policies over military policies. 
Discussion. The findings underscore the complexity of intergroup relations in the trilateral context. Despite widespread perceptions of hostility towards Chinese and Japanese, individual attitudes show that many Koreans are open to forming friendships across these national boundaries. This discrepancy suggests a disconnection between perceived social norms and personal beliefs, highlighting the potential for improved interpersonal relations through targeted initiatives. Promoting positive individual interactions may encourage broader acceptance and diminish the emotional appeals of nationalism that lead to parochial attitudes and conformity to social norms that support hostility. As evidenced by Germany's post-conflict reconciliation, structured social and cultural exchanges, supported by legal frameworks, can create a conducive environment for peace and collaboration. While the Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat has made strides in improving diplomatic relations, sustained efforts at both individual and societal levels are essential. Increased interaction and exchanges among the citizens of South Korea, Japan, and China can reduce prejudice and promote cooperation, ultimately fostering a more harmonious trilateral relationship

About the Authors

Jungbin Lim
Sungkyunkwan University
Korea, Republic of

Jungbin Lim, Graduate Student, Deparment of Psychology

25‒1, Seonggyungwan-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03063



Dongkyu Kim
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Korea, Republic of

Dongkyu Kim, PhD Student

193, Munji-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34051



References

1. Ahn, D. (2019). A study on the individualization in Korean society and its direction of overcoming: focusing on the human being’s views of j. S. Mill and e. Durkheim. Journal of the Humanities, 89, 285–312. https://doi.org/10.21211/jhum.89.9

2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t

3. Bar-Tal, D. (2003). Collective memory of physical violence: its contribution to the culture of violence. In E. Cairns & M. D. Roe (Eds.) The role of memory in ethnic conflict. Ethnic and intercommunity conflict series (pp. 77–93). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403919823_5

4. Baumeister, R. F., & Hastings, S. (1997). Distortions of collective memory: how groups flatter and deceive themselves. In J. W. Pennebaker, D. Paez, & B. Rimé (Eds.), Collective Memory of Political Events: Social Psychological Perspectives (pp. 277–293). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

5. Cho, Y. (2021). Convention wisdom that Koreans hate Japan the most is ought to break...20s and 30s claim China is worse. Hankookilbo.

6. Choi, E. (2018). A study on perception gap in conflict matters between korea and japan through national identity. The Journal of Asiatic Studies, 61(4), 227–258. https://doi.org/10.31930/jas.2018.12.61.4.227

7. Diomin, А. N., & Stepanova, А. V. (2023). Attitude towards the speed of social processes: development of a new inventory and assessment of its validity. Russian Psychological Journal, 20(2), 41–57, https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2023.2.3

8. Feshchenko, E. M., Golubeva, G. F., Spasennikov, V. V., & Khangaldyan, A. A. (2024). Meaning-in-life orientations in adolescents with different cultural and ethnic characteristics. Russian Psychological Journal, 21(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2024.2.8

9. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202

10. Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(2), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.295

11. Khotinets, V. Yu., Kozhevnikova, O. V., & Baranova, N. A. (2022). Congruence of the real and favored organizational culture of a modern regional company: value predictors. Russian Psychological Journal, 19(3), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.3.15

12. Kim, H. (2016). A qualitative study on contact experiences between north Korean defectors and south Koreans. Korean Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 28(2), 529–562.

13. Kim, J., Kang, C., & Han, G. (2021). Koreans’ perception on diplomacy and security: Asan annual survey results from 2010 to 2020. The Asan Institute for Policy Studies.

14. Kwon, H. (2018). Improvement means of cooperation and legal system in social and cultural domain for the social integration between south and north Korea – a comparative study with the case of Germany (Vol. 18–19-1). Korea Legislation Research Institute.

15. Kim, D. (2021). The legal characteristics and the means for effective implementation of inter-Korean agreements. Unification & Law, 45, 76–105. https://doi.org/10.36514/unilaw.2021..45.76

16. Kim, D., & Lim, J. (2024). Psychological assessment of south Koreans’ perception on unification laws: how legal psychology impacts perspectives on Korean unification policies. Russian Psychological Journal, 21(2), 6-21. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2024.2.1

17. Lynch, O., & Joyce, C. (2018). Functions of collective victimhood. International Review of Victimology, 24(2), 183–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758018758396

18. Park, J. (2009). Nationalism discourse and the narrative of ‘excluded within’: reanalyzing the controversies surrounding the ‘overseas Korean act’ and ‘regionalism’. The Institute for Peace and Unification Studies, Seoul National University.

19. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243

20. Noor, M., Vollhardt, J. R., Mari, S., & Nadler, A. (2017). The social psychology of collective victimhood. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(2), 121–134. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2300.

21. Schori-Eyal, N., Halperin, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2014). Three layers of collective victimhood: effects of multileveled victimhood on intergroup conflicts in the Israeli–Arab context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(12), 778–794. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12268

22. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Political Psychology, 276–293. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16

23. Vollhardt, J. R., Nair, R., & Tropp, L. R. (2016). Inclusive victim consciousness predicts minority group members’ support for refugees and immigrants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(6), 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12368


Review

For citations:


Lim J., Kim D. The effect of national identity and collective victimhood on south Koreans’ perception of trilateral cooperation. Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology. 2024;7(6):27-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23947/2658-7165-2024-7-6-27-34. EDN: QNVGCW

Views: 68


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2658-7165 (Online)

Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology

ISSN 2658-7165 (Online)

Contact with: Publisher / Editorial Office of the Journal

Publisher: Don State Technical University - DSTU, Rostov-on-Don, Russia - https://donstu.ru/en/

Editor-in-Chief: Irina V. Abakumova, Dr.Sci. (Psychology), Professor, Don State Technical University (Rostov-on-Don, Russia) 

Don State Technical University
1, Gagarin Sq., Rostov-on-Don, 344003, Russia
tel.: +7(863) 238-13-56, e-mail: inovppd@gmail.com

16+