Motivational readiness for professional self-realization: theoretical integration of regulatory models

Introduction. In the context of rapid digitalization, the spread of hybrid employment formats and the integration of artificial intelligence, the professional environment is undergoing fundamental changes. These processes form a context of high uncertainty, where traditional career scenarios lose effectiveness, and the individual's ability to navigate independently in the professional space comes to the fore. Despite the obvious relevance of the topic, existing psychological approaches consider motivational and regulatory mechanisms of self-realization in isolation, which creates a significant gap in understanding the dynamics of choosing behavior strategies. The lack of integrative models makes it difficult to explain how internal resources are transformed into readiness for action in the face of external constraints.

Objective. Theoretically substantiate the integrative model of motivational readiness, which synthesizes the "want-can-need" balance model and the theory of self-determination to describe the process of self-realization in conditions of uncertainty

Integrative model of motivational readiness: from comparative analysis to component structure. The points of integration of the "I want–I can–I must" model and the theory of self-determination are revealed. A four-component structure of motivational readiness is proposed, including motivational-semantic ("I want"," I need") and regulatory-instrumental blocks ("I can","decision-making"). The"need" component is differentiated as a continuum of forms of regulation – from external to integrated, which makes it possible to explain under what conditions external requirements become a resource, and not a barrier to self-realization.

Relationship of types of motivational readiness with self-realization strategies. Two types of motivational readiness are identified – autonomous and controlled-and their connection with self-realization strategies is theoretically justified.

Discussion. Integration of models makes it possible to move from describing static personality traits to analyzing the dynamic process of choosing strategies for self-realization. Differentiation of the "need" component explains the conditions under which external requirements become a resource, not a barrier. The key condition for productive self-realization is the quality of autonomous integration of external requirements in combination with the developed regulatory potential of the individual. The proposed model provides a theoretical basis for empirical research and development of psychological support programs for professional development in conditions of high autonomy and uncertainty.

1. Abramov, R. N., & Bykov, A.V. (2021). The world of professions in the context of work and employment: pandemic and digital vertigo. Economic and Social Changes Journal (Public Opinion Monitoring), (3), 4–20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.3.2001

2. Bazine, N., Battistelli, A., & Lagabrielle, M.-C. (2025). Protean career orientation as a compass for career development in the digital age. Career Development International, 30(4), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-12-2023-0384

3. Gordeeva, T. O. (2010). Self-determination theory: Present and future. Part 1: Problems of theory development. Psychological Research, 3(12). (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v3i12.906

4. Gagné, M., Parker, S. K., Griffin, M. A., Dunlop, P. D., Knight, C., Klonek, F. E., & Parent-Rocheleau, X. (2022). Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(7), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w

5. Grunwald, K. C., Van den Broeck, A., Colledani, D., Lermer, E., Falvo, R., & Hudecek, M. F. C. (2024). Validation of the German work-related basic need satisfaction scale (W-BNS-G). Current Psychology, 43, 36315–36332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06927-0

6. Hall, D. T., Yip, J., & Doiron, K. (2018). Protean careers at work: Self-direction and values orientation in psychological success. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 129–156. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104631

7. Huyghebaert-Zouaghi, T., Morin, A. J. S., Thomas, J., & Gillet, N. (2024). The daily dynamics of basic psychological need satisfaction at work, their determinants, and their implications: An application of Dynamic Structural Equation Modeling. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 33, 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2023.2276534

8. Jiang, J., & Chen, J. (2026). AI trust and protean career among university students: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation and the moderating role of job insecurity. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1749655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1749655

9. Korostyleva, L. A. (2000). Self-realization of the individual. Publishing House of the Herzen State Pedagogical University. (In Russ.)

10. Kantola, J., & Keller, M. (2025). "I miss those chance encounters": Innovative work behavior in hybrid and remote work. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17, Article 100823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100823

11. Laguerre, R. A., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2024). Bringing self-determination theory to the forefront: Examining how human resource practices motivate employees of all ages to succeed. Journal of Business and Psychology, 40, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-024-09951-w

12. Leontiev, D. A. (1997). Self-realization and essential human powers. In Psychology with a human face (pp. 156–175). Meaning. (In Russ.)

13. Leontiev, D. A., & Osin, E. N. (2014). Reflection "good" and "bad": from an explanatory model to differential diagnosis. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 11(4), 110–135. (In Russ.)

14. Mandrikova, E. Y. (2010). Development of a self-organization activity questionnaire. Psychological diagnostics, 2, 59–83. (In Russ.)

15. McAnally, K., & Hagger, M. S. (2024). Self-determination theory and workplace outcomes: A conceptual review and future research directions. Behavioral Sciences, 14(6), Article 428. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14060428

16. Osin, E. N., Gorbunova, A. A., Gordeeva, T. O., Ivanova, T. Yu., Kosheleva, N. V., & Ovchinnikova, E. Yu. (2017). Professional Motivation Questionnaire (OPM-2): adaptation and validation of the methodology. Psychological Journal, 38(4), 88–101. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.7868/S0205959217040089

17. Osin, E. N., & Kosheleva, N. V. (2020). Test of life-meaning orientations: new data on structure and validity. Questions of psychology, 6(4), 150–163. (In Russ.)

18. Olafsen, A. H., & Marescaux, B. (2025). The bare necessities: A necessary condition analysis of the dual role of basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration on wellbeing at work. Motivation and Emotion. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-025-10113-5

19. Popkova, K. V., & Balabanova, E. S. (2021). Motivation of creative workers ' work: normative representations and reality of working life. Monitoring Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, (3), 290–315. (In Russ.)

20. Rubinstein, S. L. (2003). Being and consciousness. Man and the world. Piter. (In Russ.)

21. Yarskaya-Smirnova, E. R., & Yarskaya-Smirnova, V. N. (2022). The Life World of a Helping Profession in the Pandemic: Rethinking of Symbolic Boundaries. Sociological Studies, (11), 112–122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250021064-3

22. Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2021). Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory's empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motivation Science, 7(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000194

23. Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4

24. Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S. K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 16–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12290

25. Zhuravlev, A. L. (2018). Psychology of professional self-realization of a person. Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)