The influence of the delayed life syndrome on the satisfaction with the life of the individual

   In the Introduction the need for the use of artificial intelligence in the organization of contacts between foster parents and children left without parental care is indicated. The relevance of the topic is caused by the need to consider the numerous variable characteristics of the future substitute family and the adopted child. Artificial intelligence allows using independent indicators to find matches between the requests of a family and a child.

   The novelty of the study lies in the study of possibilities of artificial intelligence to find matches between the requests of a family and a child, using independent indicators.

   The «Methods» section describes the analysis of the best pedagogical practice of using the digital platform "All your own", created by specialists of the Charity Foundation "Sunny City" of Novosibirsk. Currently, 570 children, 140 specialists of support and guardianship services are registering on the platform, and 200 personal offices of candidates for foster parents have been created. The theoretical basis of the appeal to artificial intelligence in the search for a family for orphans is the scientific nature of the information accepted as filling the content of the digital platform; orientation to the person and his humanistic component; targeting; mediated interaction with officials; focus on public solidarity. The «Results» section reflects the pedagogical conditions for the effective use of artificial intelligence in the search for foster parents for a child are the support of the platform participants by specialists; visibility of obtaining information about family resources for a particular child through matrices of matching family and child requests; involvement of parents in introspection of family resources and personal resources; use of the platform as a preliminary stage, which is necessarily followed by personal interaction foster parents with an escort service specialist. In the Discussion of the results, it is stated that the creation of the "All Your Own" platform is the first attempt in the Russian Federation to use artificial intelligence to organize a meeting between a child and his future foster family. In the Conclusion, the author notes that for the first time, the theoretical prerequisites are disclosed, and the pedagogical conditions for using the digital platform are revealed, which allow considering the maximum possible criteria for the resourcing of a family and a child.

1. Andersson, G. (2001). The Motives of Foster Parents, Their Family and Work Circumstances. British Journal of Social Work, 31(2), 235–248. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/31.2.235

2. Fedorova, Yu. A., Eremeev, V. Yu., Kartashov, N. I. (2019). Psychological characteristics of the candidate for substitute parents. Problems of modern pedagogical education, 64–4, 315–317. (in Russ.).

3. Forrester, D., Westlake, D., Glynn, G. (2012). Parental resistance and social worker skills: Towards a theory of motivational social work. Child & Family Social Work. Special Issue: Parental Engagement with Services when Children may be at Risk, 17(2), 118–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2012.00837.x

4. Galaguzova, Yu. N., Mazurchuk, N. I. (2020). The substitute family as a psychological and pedagogical phenomenon: structural and functional features and typical difficulties. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 13(1), 62–69. (in Russ.).

5. Gayfullina, N. G., Ismailova, N. I. (2020). Motivation for the adoption of a child and the functions of future foster parents. Modern pedagogical education issues, 68–1, 323–326. (in Russ.).

6. Helmutdinova, M. R. (2022). Pedagogical model for the adaptation of a foster child in a substitute family. Kazan Pedagogical Journal, 2(151), 188–194. (in Russ.).

7. Kolesnikova, G. I. (2018). Artificial intelligence: problems and prospects. Videoscience, 2(10), 34–39. (in Russ.).

8. Laird, S. E., Morris, K., Archard, P., Clawson, R. (2017). Changing practice: The possibilities and limits for reshaping social work practice, Qualitative Social Work, 17(4), 577–593. doi: 10.1177/1473325016688371

9. Lavrentieva, Z. I. (2021). Digital platform as a technology for the family device of orphans and children left without parental care. Socio-Political Studies, 4(13), 110–120. (in Russ.).

10. Lavrentieva, Z. I. (2021). Pedagogical foundations of creating a digital service for future substitute parents. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 1, 33–43. doi: 10.15293/1813-4718.2201.03. (in Russ.).

11. Makulin, A. V. (2016). Intelligent systems in the humanities and digital philosophy. Bulletin of the Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 76–86. (in Russ.).

12. Marcenko, M., Brown, R., DeVoy, P. R., Conway, D. (2010). Engaging parents: Innovative approaches in child welfare. Protecting Children. American Humane, 25(1), 23–34.

13. Pronina, A. N., Markova, S. V., Martynova, L. N. (2020). Life values and personality orientation of foster parents living in a megalopolis and rural areas. Pedagogy and psychology of education, 4, 170–184. doi: 10.31862/2500-297X-2020-4-170-184. (in Russ.).

14. Samoilovskaya, A. N., Chebotareva, E. Yu. (2020). The attitude of blood-related teenage children to foster children. Psychology and psychotherapy of the family, 3–4, 5–25. (in Russ.).

15. Strelenko, A. A. (2020) Social perception of an adopted child in a substitute family. The Scientific Heritage, 4(44), 66–71. (in Russ.).