Meaning-of-life Orientations and Strategies of Coping Behavior in Young People with Different Orientations for the Future

Introduction. At the moment an urgent topic of psychological research is the identification of opportunities for young people to overcome difficult life situations, especially in situations of uncertainty. One of the areas of research in this area is the relationship of the choice of coping strategies with elements of the value-meaning sphere, this can shed light on the mechanisms of meaning regulation of the choice of ways to overcome difficult situations.

Objective. The study of the choice of various coping strategies in connection with life orientations is depending on the type of orientation for the future in young people.

Materials and methods. The method “Meaning-of-life orientations” by D. A. Leontiev was used to determine the meaning-of-life orientations of young people. According to this methodology, the respondents’ orientation towards the future was also determined using indicators on the “goals in life” scale: the presence of a goal in the future, orientation and time perspective, and on the “process of life” scale. The methodology “Methods of coping behavior” by R. Lazarus was applied to determine the choice of coping strategies.

Results. The subjects were young people aged 19–23 years. According to the severity of the orientation towards the future, the sample was divided into two groups: with high and medium orientation towards the future (group 1, 47.3 %), and with low and below average (group 2, 52.7 %). An analysis of the results obtained which is used the “Life-meaning orientations” method showed that the studied groups of young people have differences in the severity of all scales of CSF. According to the results, the greatest differences were found on the scales of “Goals in life” and “Locus of control of life”. Statistical analysis of the differences which used the Mann-Whitney U criterion in the severity of coping behavior strategies showed that significant differences between the groups were identified by the indicator “Problem solving planning”.

Discussion. The results obtained on the type of orientation towards the future as a predictor of the choice of coping strategies are consistent with existing data that overcoming a problem through a purposeful analysis of the situation and possible behaviors, planning one’s own actions taking into account objective conditions, past experience and available resources can help a person manage a difficult situation more effectively and reduce negative consequences through the use of imagination and constructive modeling of the future.

1. Abakumova, I. V. Azarko, E. M., Komarova, N. E., & Pakhomova, V. G. (2022). The attitude to the time perspective and the features of the value-semantic sphere of students in the context of digitalization. The world of science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 10(4).

2. Bezuglova, A. A., Vasilyeva, O. S., & Pravdina, L. R. (2017). Features of socio-psychological adaptation in individuals with different coping strategies. Russian Psychological Journal, 14(4), 180–204.

3. Bordonosenko, A. S. (2023). Strategies for overcoming difficult life situations in men and women with alcohol dependence. North-Caucasian Psychological Bulletin, 21(1), 49–57, https://doi.org/10.21702/ncpb.2023.1.5

4. Dragomir, V. I. (2016). The problem of studying coping strategies in psychology. In Problems, prospects and directions of innovative development of science: collection of articles of the international scientific and practical conference: collection of articles of the International Scientific and practical Conference (October 1, 2016, Ufa). At 2 p.m. 1. (pp. 228-231). Ufa: AETERNA.

5. Godunov, M. V., & Portnov, E. A. (2023). Prospects for studying the semantic strategy of avoidance. Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology, 6(4), 81-88.

6. Gutnik, E. P. (2018). Volitional coping resources of a person in a situation of uncertainty. HERALD OF OMSK UNIVERSITY. Series «PSYCHOLOGY», 4. 31–34.

7. Hans, T. (2000). A meta-analysis of the effects of adventure programming on locus of control. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 30 (1), 33–60.

8. Istanbul, S. A. (2015). The relationship of coping behavior with the cognitive sphere of personality. In V. B. Nikishina (ed.) Psychology of health and disease: a clinical and psychological approach: materials of the V Anniversary All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation (pp. 184–187). KSMU.

9. Khazhuev, I. S. (2019). The specifics of the development of coping mechanisms and the psychological safety of the individual at a remote stage of an emergency situation. Problems of modern pedagogical education, 62-2, 325-329.

10. Klimenko, V. A., Grishina, A. V., & Pronenko, E. A. (2023). The role of psychological resources in overcoming difficult life situations among educational migrants. Russian Psychological Journal, 20(4), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2023.4.1

11. Kuznetsova, A. D. (2018). Modern research on coping strategies in the aspect of labor psychology. Bulletin of the Institute of World Civilizations, 9(2), 96–99.

12. Leontiev, D. A. (2000). Meaning Orientation Test (SMD). 2nd ed. Meaning.

13. Levkova, T. V. (2018). The relationship between achievement motivation and coping strategies of the individual. In Сategory of "social" in modern pedagogy and psychology: materials of the 6th All-Russian scientific and practical conference with remote and international participation (pp. 235–240). Zebra.

14. Murtazina, I. R. (2018). Self-preservation behavior, quality of life, and preferred coping strategies of men and women in early adulthood. Penza psychological newsletter PSYCHOLOGY-NEWS.RU, 1 (10), 89–110.

15. Omarova, M. K. (2018). Achievement motivation and coping behavior of a person. Bulletin of scientific conferences, 7-1 (35), 72–73.

16. Scherbakova, T., Misirov, D. N., Akopyan, M. A., Ogannisyan, L. The student as a subject of transformative in the period of professional training. E3S Web of Conferences, 175, 15013 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017515013

17. Shamshikova, O. A., Gerasimova, P. S., & Schwartz, A. V. (2015). The relationship between coping strategies and the level of development of social intelligence. In Human Development in the Modern World: materials of the VI All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International participation: in 2 parts (pp. 122–133). Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University.

18. Sukhovey, A.V., Kovalenko, S. V., and Nosov, E. N. (2018). Coping resources and coping strategies as a single system of influence in personal behavior. Problems of modern pedagogical education, 58-1, 363–368.

19. Wasserman, L. I., Iovlev, B. V., Isaeva, E. R., Trifonova, E. A., Shchelkova, O. Yu., Novozhilova, M. Yu., & Vux, A. Ya. (2009). A technique for the psychological diagnosis of coping methods. NIPNI named after Bekhterev.

20. Wentzel, K. R. (2003). Motivating Students to Behave in Socially Competent Ways. Theory Into Practice, 42(4), 319–326.