Recognition of Emotions by Young People with Disabilities
https://doi.org/10.23947/2658-7165-2024-7-2-50-63
Abstract
Introduction. This paper presents the results of a comparative study on the retrieval and recognition of basic emotions from photographs by young men and women with disabilities, including groups with somatic diseases, nervous system diseases, mental and behavioral disorders, and ear diseases.
Objective. Identify the peculiarities of emotion recognition by people with disabilities.
Materials and Methods. The main sample consisted of 99 men and females, with disabilities, aged 18 to 26 years. The average age of the respondents was 20.6 years. Within the framework of the empirical study, we used the computer programme "Programme for assessing the level of emotion recognition (emotional intelligence testing)" and APC "Activationometer AC-6". Within the framework of statistical data processing, the Mann-Whitney U-criterion, the Wilcoxon T-criterion and the Kraskell-Woliss H-criterion were used to investigate the reliability of differences.
Results. The study revealed that there are differences in the specifics of passing the test to find and recognizing basic emotions in photographs depending on the functional asymmetry of the brain hemispheres. All the studied groups with disabilities recognized the emotion "joy" on the photos faster and more correctly, while the emotion "anger" was recognized worse and took more time. Representatives of the studied groups having left-hemispheric shift of the indicators of functional asymmetry of hemispheres demonstrated significantly higher indicators of the speed of search for target basic emotions and correctness of their recognition. The novelty of the study lies in the use of a new approach to the form of tests to search and recognize basic emotions of the target from photographs and to assess the activation of brain hemispheres in people with disabilities.
Discussion. Respondents with a left-hemispheric bias identified target emotions faster and more accurately, which may be related to the high activation and energy expenditure of the left hemisphere and indicate a significant contribution of the left hemisphere in the recognition and retrieval of emotions. The emotion "joy" was recognized faster and more accurately than "anger" in all subjects, which may be related to the frequency of occurrence of the emotion during communication, facial mimic activity and specificity of emotion manifestation in relation to the persons under study.
About the Author
Vadim Y. GorelovRussian Federation
Lecturer, Novocherkassk special boarding school No. 1"; Ministry of Labor (116, Platovsky Ave., Novocherkassk, 346400, Russian Federation); Postgraduate of the Psychophysiology and Clinical Psychology Department, Southern Federal University (105/42, Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, 344006, Russian Federation)
References
1. Abbott, J. D., Cumming, G., Fidler, F., & Lindell, A. K. (2013). The perception of positive and negative facial expressions in unilateral brain-damaged patients: A meta-analysis. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 18(4), 437-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650X.2012.703206
2. Bourne, V. J. (2010). How are emotions lateralised in the brain? Contrasting existing hypotheses using the chimeric faces test. Cognition and Emotion, 24(5), 903-911. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903007714
3. Cheng, Y., Lee, S. Y., Chen, H. Y., Wang, P. Y., & Decety, J. (2012). Voice and emotion processing in the human neonatal brain. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 24(6), 1411-1419. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00214
4. Critchley, H. D., & Nagai, Y. (2016). Comment: What does left-right autonomic asymmetry signify? Emotion Review, 8(1), 76–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914565520
5. Ermakov, P. N., & Gorelov, V. Y. (2022). Theory of mind in persons with permanent hearing disorders. Russian Psychological Journal, 19(4), 137–147. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2022.4.9
6. Goshvarpour, A., Abbasi, A., Goshvarpour, A., & Daneshvar, S. (2017). Discrimination between different emotional states based on the chaotic behaviour of galvanic skin responses. Signal, Image and Video Processing, 11, 1347–1355. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11760-017-1092-9
7. Gorelov, V. Y. (2023). The relationship of emotional intelligence and personality characteristics with functional brain asymmetry in persons with hearing impairment. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 11(2), 22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.15862/22PSMN223
8. Gorelov, V. Y., & Krupodyorova, I. A. (2022). Features of emotional intelligence and personality traits in individuals with disease of the nervous system. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 10(3), 12. (In Russ.)
9. Gorelov, V. Yu., Arapova, E. A., Ermakov, P. N. (2023). A programme for assessing the level of emotion recognition (emotional intelligence testing) (RU Certificate No.2023663675). (In Russ.)
10. Irish, M., Kumfor, F., Hodges, J. R., & Piguet, O. (2013). A tale of two hemispheres: contrasting socioemotional dysfunction in right-versus left-lateralised semantic dementia. Dementia & neuropsychologia, 7, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642013DN70100014
11. Konovalov, V. F., & Serikov, I. S. (1985). A study of the hemispheric interaction in children engaged in mnestic activity. Voprosy psychologii, 6, 137–145. (In Russ.)
12. Korobova, S. Y., Gryazeva-Dobshinskaya, V. G., & Chipeeva, N. A. (2021). Features of the correlation between two-sided electrodermal activity and eeg spectrum power. Psychology. Psychophysiology, 14(3), 108–118. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.14529/jpps210311
13. Kostychev, N. A., Batorova, E. Y., Makushkin, A. V., & Perepelov, A. V. (2019). Dependence of skin-galvanic response on emotional state in young boys and girls. Trends in the Development of Science and Education, 51-6, 34–36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18411/lj-06-2019-130
14. Kudashova, A. A., Apollonova, I. A., Nikolaev, A. P., Kalyukina, A. Y., & Kudashov, I. A. (2018). Part of the autonomic nervous system in the organization of emotional states. Biological Sciences. Youth scientific bulletin, 2(27), 7–15. (In Russ.)
15. Kumar, D., & Srinivasan, N. (2011). Emotion perception is mediated by spatial frequency content. Emotion, 11(5), 1144. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025453
16. Lacroix, J. M., & Comper, P. (1979). Lateralisation in the electrodermal system as a function of cognitive/hemispheric manipulations. Psychophysiology, 16(2), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01454.x
17. Najt, P., Bayer, U., & Hausmann, M. (2013). Models of hemispheric specialisation in facial emotion perception - a reevaluation. Emotion, 13(1), 159. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029723
18. Nesterova, N. A. (1978). Intellectual activity and electrodermal indices. Studies on problems of social and community psychology and differential psychophysiology (P. 110–113). Research Institute of General Pedagogy of the APN USSR. (In Russ.)
19. Önal-Hartmann, C., Pauli, P., Ocklenburg, S., & Güntürkün, O. (2012). The motor side of emotions: investigating the relationship between hemispheres, motor reactions and emotional stimuli. Psychological research, 76, 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0337-4
20. Picard, R. W., Fedor, S., & Ayzenberg, Y. (2016). Multiple arousal theory and daily-life electrodermal activity asymmetry. Emotion review, 8(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914565517
21. Rusalova, M. N. (1988). “Influence of emotions on activation of the left and right cerebral hemispheres of the person. Journal Human Physiology, 14(5), 754–761. (In Russ.)
22. Rusalova, M. N., & Rusalov, V. M. (2020). Functional brain asymmetry and emotion. Handbook of functional asymmetry (pp. 521–551). Scientific World.
23. Simonov, P. V. (1996). Adaptive functions of the emotions. Human Physiology, 22(2), 5–9. (In Russ.)
24. Sedda, A., Rivolta, D., Scarpa, P., Burt, M., Frigerio, E., Zanardi, G., Piazzini, A., Turner, K., Canevini, M. P., Francione, S., Lo Russo, G., & Bottini, G. (2013). Ambiguous emotion recognition in temporal lobe epilepsy: the role of expression intensity. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 452–463. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415- 013-0153-y
25. Shobe, E. R. (2014). Independent and collaborative contributions of the cerebral hemispheres to emotional processing. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 8, 230. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00230
26. Smith, S. D., & Bulman-Fleming, M. B. (2005). An examination of the right-hemisphere hypothesis of the lateralisation of emotion. Brain and cognition, 57(2), 210–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.046
27. Varni, J. G. (1975). Learned asymmetry of localised electrodermal responses. Psychophysiology, 12(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1975.tb03057.x
28. Wang, C. A., Baird, T., Huang, J., Coutinho, J. D., Brien, D. C., & Munoz, D. P. (2018). Arousal effects on pupil size, heart rate, and skin conductance in an emotional face task. Frontiers in neurology, 9, 1029. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01029
29. Yuvaraj, R., Murugappan, M., Norlinah, M. I., Sundaraj, K., & Khairiyah, M. (2013). Review of emotion recognition in stroke patients. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders, 36(3-4), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353440
30. Zhang, J., Zhou, R., & Oei, T. P. (2011). The effects of valence and arousal on hemispheric asymmetry of emotion. Journal of Psychophysiology, 25(2), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000045
31. Zvyagina, N. V., Startseva, I. V., Gurieva, M. N., & Mohamad-Sohib, K. (2016). Effects of images of faces with different emotions on the functional state organism. Natural and Mathematical Sciences in the Modern World, 7, 7–13. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Gorelov V.Y. Recognition of Emotions by Young People with Disabilities. Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology. 2024;7(2):50-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23947/2658-7165-2024-7-2-50-63