Diagnostics and development of students' conceptual abilities in the educational process
Abstract
The article is devoted to the content creation in the educational process for the diagnosis and development of conceptual abilities of students. The theoretical foundations of signs, that conceptual thinking, categorical and conceptual abilities in students, who are involved in research activities, are actualized, are described in the section «Introduction», which is based on the research of M. A. Kholodnaya, S. A. Hazova, A. V. Trifonova and others. Based on the «Conceptual Synthesis» diagnostic technique, the study used a technological method for developing conceptual abilities, which involves students to create developing and diagnostic triads (educational texts) in the semantic field of the concept of «artificial intelligence», compiling relationships within each triad, and evaluating sentences based on triads. The section «Results and discussion of results» describes the stages of development of stimulus material in the field of the concept of «Artificial Intelligence»; grouping of triads (three words), their expert assessment and hierarchical structuring; testing of the developed triads in the educational process was carried out on a group of people with professional competence in relation to the concept of «artificial intelligence». The study involved 26 people-future IT specialists (postgraduates and master students). The results were interpreted. A new view on the problem of intellectual development of students in the study of artificial intelligence is presented. The method of correlation analysis, expert estimates, determination of the frequency of occurrence of signs were used in processing the results. In closing, it is concluded that the educational text «Conceptual synthesis» is aimed at evaluating the study and development of cognitive structures of knowledge and conceptual experience of students and postgraduates on the topic of artificial intelligence. The development of thematic triads determines not only the effectiveness of intellectual activity in general, but also characterize the success of educational activities.
About the Authors
I. A. Kibal’chenkoRussian Federation
Irina A. Kibal’chenko
Taganrog
A. O. Grigoryev
Russian Federation
Anton O. Grigoryev
Taganrog
Yu. A. Krinichnyy
Russian Federation
Yuryy A. Krinichnyy
Taganrog
A. A. Rodina
Russian Federation
Arina A. Rodina
Taganrog
K.v I. Morev
Russian Federation
Kirill I. Morev
Taganrog
References
1. Khazova, S. A. (2014). Mental resources of a person in different age periods: thesis research (Doctoral dissertation). Kostroma. (in Russ.).
2. Kholodnaya, M. A. (2015). Intelligence, creativity, teachability: resource-based view (V.N. Druzhinin’s ideas development). Psychological journal, 36(5), 5–14.
3. Kholodnaya, M. A. (2019). Psychology of intelligence. Antinomies in research. 3 rd edition revised and enlarged. Moscow: Yurait Publ.
4. Kholodnaya, M. A. & Khazova, S. A. (2017). Conceptualization as the basis of intellectual activity and coping behaviour efficiency. Psychological journal, 38(5), 5–17.
5. Chatila, R., Renaudo, E., & Andries, M., Chavez-Garcia, R.-O., Luce-Vayrac, P., Gottstein, R., et al. (2018). Toward self-aware robots. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5, 88. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00088
6. Dehaene, S., Lau, H., & Kouider, S. (2017). What is consciousness, and could machines have it? Science, 358, 486–492. doi: 10.1126/science.aan8871
7. Fogel, A. L. & Kvedar, J. C. (2018). Artificial intelligence powers digital medicine // npj Digital Medicine, 1. doi:10.1038/s41746-017-0012-2
8. Gobet, F. & Sala, G. How artificial intelligence can help us understand human creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01401
9. Grigore, E. C., Pereira, A., Zhou, I., Wang, D. & Scassellati, B. (2016). Talk to me: verbal communication improves perceptions of friendship and social presence in human-robot interaction. In D. Traum, W. Swartout, P. Khooshabeh, S. Kopp, S. Scherer, and A. Leuski (Eds), Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_5
10. Kennedy, J., Baxter, P. & Belpaeme T. (2017). Nonverbal immediacy as a characterisation of social behaviour for human-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 9, 109–128. doi: 10.1007/s12369-016-0378-3
11. Kholodnaya, M.A. & Volkova, E.V. (2016). Conceptual structures, conceptual abilities and cognitive functioning efficiency: the ontological approach. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 914–922.
12. Kinouchi, Y. & Mackin, K. J. (2018). A basic architecture of an autonomous adaptive system with conscious-like function for a humanoid robot. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 5. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2018.00030
13. Levy, D. (2009). The ethical treatment of artificially conscious robots. International Journal of Social Robotics. 1, 209–216. doi: 10.1007/s12369-009-0022-6
14. Ergen, M. (2019). What is Artificial Intelligence? Technical Considerations and Future Perception. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, 22. P. 5-7.
15. Solaiman, S. M. (2017). Legal personality of robots, corporations, idols and chimpanzees: a quest for legitimacy. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 25, 155–179. doi: 10.1007/s10506-016-9192-3
Review
For citations:
Kibal’chenko I.A., Grigoryev A.O., Krinichnyy Yu.A., Rodina A.A., Morev K.I. Diagnostics and development of students' conceptual abilities in the educational process. Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology. 2020;3(1):19-30. (In Russ.)