The study of the technology of humane teacher influences for the development of student motivation
Abstract
The current article discusses issues relevant to the higher education system related to the main types of humane influences of teachers on students, their role in the development of motivation in the educational process. In particular, the level of productivity of teachers with a humanistic orientation, the effectiveness of the teacher's influence on students with various forms of influence is considered. Purpose of the research: to study the technologies of the teacher's humane influences on students for the development of student motivation in the classroom. Analysis of theoretical literature showed the importance of the teacher's humane influence on students and the role of motivation in the educational process. Research methods: testing and questioning, including the author's questionnaire and methodology for diagnosing student learning motivation (A. A. Rean and V. A. Yakunin, modified by N. Ts. Badmaeva). In the empirical part of the study, we obtained the following results: the dominant motives of educational activity are professional and educational-cognitive motives; the least expressed motives among students – the motives of avoidance, the motives of prestige and the motives of creative self-realization. Discussion of the results: According to numerous scientific studies, the most effective in the educational process at the university are precisely the humane (positive) influence of teachers on students. The results revealed in our empirical study showed the relationship between the use of technologies of humane influences of teachers on students and the level of students' motivation. The novelty of the research lies in the fact that the most frequently used humane (positive) influence of teachers on students, identified in our study, are “advice and suggestion” and “encouragement of independence”, which positively affects the cognitive motivation of students' learning activities.
About the Authors
A. S. Berberyan
Russian-Armenian University
Armenia
Armenia
Asya S. Berberyan
Yerevan
A. A. Grigoryan
Russian-Armenian University
Armenia
Armenia
Anna A. Grigoryan
Yerevan
References
1. Abakumova, I. V. (2003). Teaching and meaning: meaning formation in the educational process (Psychological and didactic approach). Rostov-on-Don: Rostov University Publishing House. (in Russ.).
2. Aseyev, V. G. (1976). Motivation of behavior and personality formation. Moscow: Prosveshcheniye. (in Russ.).
3. Bayborodova, L. V., Rozhkov, M. I. (2016). Theory and methodology of education: a textbook for students of institutions of higher professional education. Yaroslavl': YAGPU im. K.D. Ushinskogo. (in Russ.).
4. Berberyan, A. S. (2014). Psychology of higher education in the context of humanization: textbook. Praga. (in Russ.).
5. Bodalev, A. A. Krivolap, L. I. (1974). On the impact of the teacher's communication style with students on their emotional experience. In Communication and education problems, part 1 (pp. 185–192). Tartu. (in Russ.).
6. Bozhovich, L. I. (2015). Personality formation problems. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter. (in Russ.).
7. Davydov, V. V. (2016). Developmental learning theory. Moscow: AST. (in Russ.).
8. Gordeyeva, T. O. (2006). The psychology of achievement motivation. M.: Smysl; Publishing Center "Academy". (in Russ.).
9. Il'in, Ye. P. (2014). Motivation and motives. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter. (in Russ.).
10. Kember, D. (2016). Understanding the nature of motivation and motivating students through teaching and learning in higher education. Springer Science+Business Media. Maslow A. (1975). The Farther Reaches of Human Nature. N.Y.: Viking Press.
11. Kleptsova, E. Yu., Rubtsova, D. O. (2016). Problems of motivating university students // Nauchno-metodicheskiy elektronnyy zhurnal «Kontsept» = Scientific-methodical electronic journal "Concept", 32, 60–66. (in Russ.).
12. Leont'yev, D. A. (2016). A. N. Leontiev's concept of motive and the problem of the quality of motivation. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14: Psikhologiya = Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2, 3–18. (in Russ.).
13. Mel'nikov, V. Ye. (2016). Motivation for teaching students at a university as a psychological and pedagogical problem. Vestnik NovGU, 5 (96). (in Russ.).
14. Meshcheryakova, I. N. (2015). Features of motivation of educational activity of students-psychologists of various courses. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 4, 137–143. (in Russ.).
15. Pidkasistyy, P. I. (2015). Organization of educational and cognitive activities of students: Textbook. Moscow: Akademiya. (in Russ.).
16. Rogers C. R. On Becoming a Person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1961.
17. Skatkin, M. N. (1980). Problems of modern didactics. Moscow: Pedagogika. (in Russ.).
18. Vygotskiy, L. S. (2015). Pedagogical psychology. Moscow: AST. (in Russ.).
19. Zakunova, Ye. D., Anisimova, A. Ye., Slyuzneva, K. V., Gordeyev, K. S., Zhidkov, A. A. (2018). Motivating students to learn. Sovremennyye nauchnyye issledovaniya i innovatsii = Modern scientific researches and innovations, 11. URL: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2018/11/88167 (accessed: 15.09.2020). (in Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Berberyan A.S., Grigoryan A.A. The study of the technology of humane teacher influences for the development of student motivation. Innovative science: psychology, pedagogy, defectology. 2020;3(2):22-31. (In Russ.)
Views:
108
Email this article 